Suppr超能文献

在新生儿重症监护病房,穿隔离衣不会影响定植或感染率。

Gowning does not affect colonization or infection rates in a neonatal intensive care unit.

作者信息

Pelke S, Ching D, Easa D, Melish M E

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Kapiolani Medical Center for Women and Children, Honolulu.

出版信息

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1994 Oct;148(10):1016-20. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1994.02170100014004.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To study the effect of gowning in a neonatal intensive care unit on colonization patterns, necrotizing enterocolitis, respiratory syncytial virus and other infections, mortality, and traffic and handwashing patterns.

METHODS

Alternate 2-month gowning and no-gowning cycles were established in a 24-bed level III neonatal intensive care unit for 8 months, with respiratory site, umbilical, and stool surveillance cultures done weekly on all patients. Traffic flow and handwashing compliance were evaluated by direct observation.

RESULTS

Demographic data did not differ between periods. There were no significant differences between the gowning and no-gowning periods in the rates of bacterial colonization, any type of infection, or mortality. There was no effect on traffic flow or handwashing compliance.

CONCLUSION

Gowning in the neonatal intensive care unit is an unnecessary custom without benefit in neonatal colonization, infection rates, mortality, traffic patterns, and handwashing behavior.

摘要

目的

研究新生儿重症监护病房穿隔离衣对定植模式、坏死性小肠结肠炎、呼吸道合胞病毒及其他感染、死亡率以及人员流动和洗手模式的影响。

方法

在一个拥有24张床位的Ⅲ级新生儿重症监护病房,建立为期8个月的交替进行的2个月穿隔离衣周期和不穿隔离衣周期,每周对所有患者进行呼吸道部位、脐部和粪便的监测培养。通过直接观察评估人员流动和洗手依从性。

结果

不同时期的人口统计学数据无差异。穿隔离衣期和不穿隔离衣期在细菌定植率、任何类型感染率或死亡率方面均无显著差异。对人员流动或洗手依从性没有影响。

结论

在新生儿重症监护病房穿隔离衣是一种不必要的惯例,对新生儿定植、感染率、死亡率、人员流动模式和洗手行为均无益处。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验