Avery C M, Jamieson N V, Calne R Y
Academic Department of Surgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
Br J Surg. 1994 Jul;81(7):987-8. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800810719.
An audit was performed to examine the time of administration of heparin and antibiotic prophylaxis to patients at risk of deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism and post-operative wound infection. The records of 648 consecutive patients undergoing major surgery within a 12-month period were reviewed retrospectively. Heparin prophylaxis was given before surgery to only 30.9 per cent of patients undergoing elective procedures and in only 22.7 per cent of emergencies. Antibiotic prophylaxis was given before operation or at induction of anaesthesia to 82.1 per cent of patients undergoing elective procedures and in only 72.1 per cent of emergencies. It is concluded that administration of heparin and antibiotic prophylaxis is inadequate despite the provision of a written protocol.
进行了一项审计,以检查对有深静脉血栓形成、肺栓塞和术后伤口感染风险的患者给予肝素和抗生素预防的时间。回顾性审查了在12个月期间连续接受大手术的648例患者的记录。接受择期手术的患者中,只有30.9%在手术前给予肝素预防,而急诊患者中这一比例仅为22.7%。接受择期手术的患者中,82.1%在手术前或麻醉诱导时给予抗生素预防,而急诊患者中这一比例仅为72.1%。得出的结论是,尽管提供了书面方案,但肝素和抗生素预防的给药仍不充分。