• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

半球启动效应影响双耳分听中的右耳优势。

Hemispheric priming affects right-ear advantage in dichotic listening.

作者信息

Jäncke L

机构信息

Department of Psychobiology and Psychocybernetics, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Neurosci. 1994 Jan-Feb;74(1-4):71-7. doi: 10.3109/00207459408987230.

DOI:10.3109/00207459408987230
PMID:7928116
Abstract

The effects of hemispheric preactivation on dichotic listening performance were investigated in a sample of 45 right-handed male adults. The dichotic stimuli (/ka/, /ta/, /pa/, /ga/, /da/ and /ba/) were presented under three conditions: prior to the test session and during test pauses subjects were confronted with (1) verbal or (2) spatial tasks, and (3) in a control session subjects received no prior task. It was shown that recall accuracy from the right ear was significantly increased when subjects performed verbal tasks prior to the experiment as compared to those experimental conditions in which subjects had to perform a spatial or no special task. Left ear scores were unaffected by these manipulations. The results suggest that verbal tasks performed prior to the dichotic listening experiment primes the hemisphere for verbal stimuli, resulting in a superior dichotic listening performance. Possible consequences for dichotic listening research are discussed.

摘要

在45名右利手成年男性样本中,研究了半球预激活对双耳分听表现的影响。双耳刺激(/ka/、/ta/、/pa/、/ga/、/da/和/ba/)在三种条件下呈现:在测试阶段之前以及测试暂停期间,受试者面临(1)语言任务或(2)空间任务,并且(3)在对照阶段,受试者不接受先前任务。结果表明,与受试者必须执行空间任务或无特定任务的实验条件相比,当受试者在实验前执行语言任务时,右耳的回忆准确率显著提高。左耳得分不受这些操作的影响。结果表明,在双耳分听实验之前执行的语言任务会使半球对语言刺激产生预激活,从而导致更好的双耳分听表现。讨论了双耳分听研究的可能后果。

相似文献

1
Hemispheric priming affects right-ear advantage in dichotic listening.半球启动效应影响双耳分听中的右耳优势。
Int J Neurosci. 1994 Jan-Feb;74(1-4):71-7. doi: 10.3109/00207459408987230.
2
Verbal dichotic listening in developmental stuttering: subgroups with atypical auditory processing.发育性口吃中的言语双耳分听:具有非典型听觉加工的亚组
Cogn Behav Neurol. 2004 Dec;17(4):224-32.
3
The influence of memory and attention on the ear advantage in dichotic listening.记忆和注意力对双耳分听中耳朵优势的影响。
Hear Res. 2016 Dec;342:144-149. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2016.10.012. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
4
Dichotic listening in schizotypal personality disorder: evidence for gender and laterality effects.精神分裂样人格障碍的双耳分听:性别和侧化效应的证据。
Schizophr Res. 2009 Dec;115(2-3):290-2. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2009.04.028. Epub 2009 May 22.
5
Priming inhibits the right ear advantage in dichotic listening: implications for auditory laterality.启动效应抑制了双耳分听中的右耳优势:对听觉偏侧性的影响。
Neuropsychologia. 2007 Jan 28;45(2):282-7. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.07.005. Epub 2006 Sep 22.
6
The effect of stimulus intensity on the right ear advantage in dichotic listening.刺激强度对双耳分听中右耳优势的影响。
Neurosci Lett. 2008 Jan 24;431(1):90-4. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2007.11.046. Epub 2007 Dec 3.
7
Unilateral forced nostril breathing affects dichotic listening for emotional tones.单侧强制鼻孔呼吸会影响对情感音调的双耳分听。
Brain Cogn. 2004 Jul;55(2):403-5. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.02.059.
8
The effect of voice-onset-time on dichotic listening with consonant-vowel syllables.语音起始时间对辅音-元音音节双耳分听的影响。
Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(2):191-6. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.05.006. Epub 2005 Jul 14.
9
The corpus callosum in dichotic listening studies of hemispheric asymmetry: a review of clinical and experimental evidence.半球不对称双耳分听研究中的胼胝体:临床与实验证据综述
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2008 Jul;32(5):1044-54. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.04.005. Epub 2008 Apr 26.
10
Atypical brain laterality in adults with ADHD during dichotic listening for emotional intonation and words.患有注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的成年人在进行双耳分听情绪语调与词汇任务时的非典型大脑偏侧化现象。
Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(6):896-904. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.08.014. Epub 2005 Oct 10.