Ahmed M W, Kadish A H, Parker M A, Goldberger J J
Department of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994 Oct;24(4):1082-90. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)90874-5.
The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the effects of physiologic and pharmacologic sympathetic stimulation on time and frequency domain indexes of heart rate variability.
Measurements of heart rate variability have been used as indexes of sympathetic tone. To date, the effects of circulating catecholamines on heart rate variability have not been evaluated.
Fourteen normal subjects (eight men, six women, mean [+/- SD] age 28.5 +/- 4.8 years) were evaluated. Five-minute electrocardiographic recordings were obtained in triplicate after physiologic and pharmacologic sympathetic stimulation: during upright tilt, after maximal exercise, during epinephrine and isoproterenol infusions at 50 ng/kg body weight per min, during beta-adrenergic blockade and during combined beta-adrenergic and parasympathetic blockade.
Beta-adrenergic stimulation resulted in a significant decrease in time domain measures of heart rate variability. The frequency domain indexes showed variable responses, depending on the individual stimulus. Tilt caused an increase in low frequency power and in the ratio of low to high frequency power. These changes were not necessarily observed with other conditions of beta-adrenergic stimulation. Double blockade suppressed baseline heart rate variability, but beta-adrenergic blockade had no significant effect. Time domain measures of heart rate variability demonstrated excellent reproducibility over the three recordings, but the frequency domain variables demonstrated fair to excellent reproducibility.
These findings suggest that different modes of beta-adrenergic stimulation may result in divergent heart rate variability responses. Thus, current heart rate variability techniques cannot be used as general indexes of "sympathetic" tone. Studies utilizing heart rate variability to quantify sympathetic tone need to consider this.
本研究旨在评估和比较生理性和药物性交感神经刺激对心率变异性时域和频域指标的影响。
心率变异性测量已被用作交感神经张力指标。迄今为止,循环儿茶酚胺对心率变异性的影响尚未得到评估。
对14名正常受试者(8名男性,6名女性,平均年龄[±标准差]28.5±4.8岁)进行评估。在生理性和药物性交感神经刺激后,重复三次获取5分钟心电图记录:直立倾斜期间、最大运动后、肾上腺素和异丙肾上腺素以每分钟50 ng/kg体重输注期间、β-肾上腺素能阻滞期间以及β-肾上腺素能和副交感神经联合阻滞期间。
β-肾上腺素能刺激导致心率变异性时域测量值显著降低。频域指标显示出不同的反应,取决于个体刺激。倾斜导致低频功率和低频与高频功率比值增加。在其他β-肾上腺素能刺激条件下不一定观察到这些变化。双重阻滞抑制了基线心率变异性,但β-肾上腺素能阻滞无显著影响。心率变异性时域测量在三次记录中具有出色的可重复性,但频域变量显示出一般到出色的可重复性。
这些发现表明,不同模式的β-肾上腺素能刺激可能导致不同的心率变异性反应。因此,目前的心率变异性技术不能用作“交感神经”张力的通用指标。利用心率变异性量化交感神经张力的研究需要考虑这一点。