Badano L, Rubartelli P, Giunta L, Della Rovere F, Miccoli F, Lucatti A
Servizio di Cardiologia, Ospedale di Nervi, Genoa, Italy.
J Electrocardiol. 1994 Jul;27(3):189-97. doi: 10.1016/s0022-0736(94)80001-4.
The relative contributions of left ventricular structural changes, dysfunction, and subendocardial ischemia in determining electrocardiographic repolarization abnormalities were assessed in 53 patients with chronic, pure aortic regurgitation and no evidence of coronary artery disease. Thirty-six patients with an abnormal electrocardiographic pattern of repolarization showed larger end-diastolic (154 +/- 46 vs 120 +/- 32 mL/m2; P < .001) and end-systolic (80 +/- 40 vs 52 +/- 30 mL/m2; P = .016) volumes, higher end-diastolic pressure (22 +/- 11 vs 15 +/- 10 mmHg; P = .021), lower ejection fraction (52 +/- 12 vs 59 +/- 13%; P < .05) and greater mass (168 +/- 48 vs 140 +/- 44 g/m2; P < .05) of the left ventricle compared to 17 patients with normal repolarization. Furthermore, patients with repolarization abnormalities also showed higher peak meridian (217 +/- 68 vs 153 +/- 92 Kdyne/cm2; P < .001) and circumferential (358 +/- 110 vs 259 +/- 153 Kdyne/cm2; P < .001) stress and a more spherical shape (end-diastolic shape: 1.4 +/- 0.1 vs 1.5 +/- 0.2, P = .046; end-systolic shape: 1.7 +/- 0.3 vs 1.9 +/- 0.3, P = .026) of the left ventricle. Patients with secondary repolarization abnormalities were also older than patients with normal repolarization (56 +/- 10 vs 40 +/- 11 years; P < .001). However, the diastolic pressure-time index/systolic pressure-time index, which is an estimate of the myocardial oxygen supply-to-demand ratio, was similar in both groups of patients (0.74 +/- 0.3 vs 0.8 +/- 0.2; P = NS).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
在53例慢性单纯主动脉瓣反流且无冠状动脉疾病证据的患者中,评估了左心室结构改变、功能障碍和心内膜下缺血在决定心电图复极异常方面的相对作用。36例心电图复极模式异常的患者与17例复极正常的患者相比,舒张末期容积(154±46 vs 120±32 mL/m²;P<.001)和收缩末期容积(80±40 vs 52±30 mL/m²;P=.016)更大,舒张末期压力更高(22±11 vs 15±10 mmHg;P=.021),射血分数更低(52±12 vs 59±13%;P<.05),左心室质量更大(168±48 vs 140±44 g/m²;P<.05)。此外,复极异常的患者还表现出更高的峰值子午线应力(217±68 vs 153±92 Kdyne/cm²;P<.001)和圆周应力(358±110 vs 259±153 Kdyne/cm²;P<.001),左心室形状更呈球形(舒张末期形状:1.4±0.1 vs 1.5±0.2,P=.046;收缩末期形状:1.7±0.3 vs 1.9±0.3,P=.026)。继发性复极异常的患者也比复极正常的患者年龄更大(56±10 vs 40±11岁;P<.001)。然而,两组患者的舒张压时间指数/收缩压时间指数(心肌氧供需比的估计值)相似(0.74±0.3 vs 0.8±0.2;P=无显著差异)。(摘要截短于250字)