Suppr超能文献

局灶性缺血模型中,间断性、重复性动脉闭塞与持续性闭塞所致的脑损伤比较

Cerebral damage caused by interrupted, repeated arterial occlusion versus uninterrupted occlusion in a focal ischemic model.

作者信息

Steinberg G K, Panahian N, Sun G H, Maier C M, Kunis D

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, California.

出版信息

J Neurosurg. 1994 Oct;81(4):554-9. doi: 10.3171/jns.1994.81.4.0554.

Abstract

Temporary intracranial arterial occlusion is often utilized during the surgical treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Although numerous experimental studies have suggested that repetitive, brief periods of global ischemia cause more severe cerebral injury than a similar single period of global ischemia, this issue has not been extensively studied in relation to focal ischemia. It remains controversial whether it is safer to use brief periods of interrupted, temporary occlusion separated by reperfusion periods, or a more prolonged, single temporary occlusion. This question is addressed in studies on a rabbit model of transient, focal cerebral ischemia. Sixteen anesthetized rabbits underwent transorbital occlusion of the left internal carotid, middle cerebral, and anterior cerebral arteries, with one of two paradigms:uninterrupted occlusion (1 hour of temporary occlusion followed by 5 hours of reperfusion in eight rabbits), or interrupted occlusion (three separate 20-minute periods of occlusion, with 10 minutes of reperfusion between occlusions, followed by 4 hours, 40 minutes of reperfusion in eight rabbits). Histopathological evaluation for ischemic neuronal damage and magnetic resonance imaging studies for ischemic edema were conducted 6 hours after the initial arterial occlusion. The animals in the interrupted, repeated occlusion group showed a 59% decrease in the area of cortical ischemic neuronal damage (mean +/- standard error of the mean 10.0% +/- 1.7%) compared with the uninterrupted occlusion group (24.4% +/- 5%, p = 0.016). There was no difference between the groups in the extent of striatal ischemic damage or area of ischemic edema. These results suggest that interrupted, repeated focal ischemia causes less cortical ischemic injury than uninterrupted transient ischemia of a similar total duration. Although caution should be exercised in extrapolating from these results to the clinical situation, they may have important implications for temporary arterial occlusion during intracranial surgery.

摘要

颅内动脉瘤手术治疗期间常采用临时颅内动脉闭塞术。尽管众多实验研究表明,重复性短暂全脑缺血比单次相似时长的全脑缺血会导致更严重的脑损伤,但这一问题在局灶性缺血方面尚未得到广泛研究。使用短暂的间歇性临时闭塞并间隔再灌注期,还是更延长的单次临时闭塞,哪种更安全仍存在争议。在一项短暂性局灶性脑缺血兔模型研究中探讨了这个问题。16只麻醉的兔子接受经眶闭塞左侧颈内动脉、大脑中动脉和大脑前动脉,采用两种模式之一:不间断闭塞(8只兔子进行1小时临时闭塞,随后5小时再灌注),或间断闭塞(8只兔子进行3次单独的20分钟闭塞,每次闭塞之间有10分钟再灌注,随后4小时40分钟再灌注)。在初次动脉闭塞6小时后进行缺血性神经元损伤的组织病理学评估和缺血性水肿的磁共振成像研究。与不间断闭塞组(24.4%±5%)相比,间断重复闭塞组动物的皮质缺血性神经元损伤面积减少了59%(平均±平均标准误10.0%±1.7%,p = 0.016)。两组在纹状体缺血损伤程度或缺血性水肿面积方面无差异。这些结果表明,与相似总时长的不间断短暂缺血相比,间断性重复局灶性缺血导致的皮质缺血损伤更小。尽管从这些结果推断临床情况时应谨慎,但它们可能对颅内手术期间的临时动脉闭塞具有重要意义。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验