Leeper H A, Janzen V, Sills P S, Ahmad D
Department of Communicative Disorders, University of Western Ontario, University Hospital, London, Canada.
J Prosthet Dent. 1994 Aug;72(2):210-6. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(94)90082-5.
This investigation was designed to compare nasal airway resistance (Rnaw) values by use of "head-out" plethysmography and standard posterior pressure-flow rhinometry. Fourteen adults who had prostheses because of velopharyngeal inadequacy caused by a variety of etiologic conditions were examined. Each patient performed rest breathing and sustained /m/ productions to develop Rnaw values for comparison. The results revealed increased Rnaw and decreased cross-sectional nasal airway area and derived velopharyngeal orifice area when the appliances were in place. The two techniques for assessing Rnaw produced comparable results when certain conditions were met. Clinical implications for team assessment of patients involved with prosthetic management are discussed.
本研究旨在通过使用“头外置”体积描记法和标准后鼻压力-流量鼻阻力测量法来比较鼻气道阻力(Rnaw)值。对14名因各种病因导致腭咽功能不全而佩戴假体的成年人进行了检查。每位患者进行静息呼吸和持续发/m/音以得出Rnaw值进行比较。结果显示,佩戴矫治器时Rnaw增加,鼻气道横截面积和腭咽口面积减小。当满足某些条件时,两种评估Rnaw的技术产生了可比的结果。文中讨论了团队对涉及假体管理的患者进行评估的临床意义。