Hovis W D, Limbird T J
Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232-2550.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1994 Jul;26(7):872-6.
Three cervical orthoses often used in football to prophylactically limit motion and prevent the nerve injury known as "burners" were evaluated to determine their performance in limiting both hyperextension and lateral bending of the cervical spine. These orthoses have been used almost entirely on an empiric basis with little objective data to evaluate performance. A rope and pulley mechanism was used to pull the neck into hyperextension and lateral motion, with the only restraint being the various products tested. These trials were videotaped and the restriction provided by the collars was calculated from goniometric analysis of the projected images. These tests were performed to determine which products limit the mechanisms of the "burner" injury and thereby assess which braces might reduce or prevent the occurrence of these injuries. The results of the investigation indicate that all braces studied provided some degree of limitation in one of the mechanisms of injury, hyperextension. One brace performed superiorly in this respect. However, the other mechanism of injury, lateral bending, is inconsistently limited.
对三种常用于橄榄球运动中预防性限制运动并预防被称为“烧灼样神经损伤”的颈部矫形器进行了评估,以确定它们在限制颈椎过度伸展和侧屈方面的性能。这些矫形器几乎完全是凭经验使用,几乎没有客观数据来评估其性能。使用绳索和滑轮机构将颈部拉至过度伸展和侧方运动,唯一的限制因素是所测试的各种产品。这些试验进行了录像,并通过对投影图像的角度测量分析来计算颈托提供的限制。进行这些测试是为了确定哪些产品能限制“烧灼样神经损伤”的机制,从而评估哪些支具可能减少或预防这些损伤的发生。调查结果表明,所研究的所有支具在损伤机制之一——过度伸展方面都提供了一定程度的限制。在这方面,有一种支具表现出色。然而,另一种损伤机制——侧屈,其限制并不一致。