Bulman-Fleming M B, Bryden M P
Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Neuropsychologia. 1994 Jul;32(7):787-97. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(94)90017-5.
By analyzing the error scores of normal participants asked to identify a specific word spoken in a specific tone of voice (for example, the word "tower" spoken in a happy tone of voice), we have been able to demonstrate concurrent verbal and affective cerebral laterality effects in a dichotic listening task. The targets comprised the 16 possible combinations of four two-syllable words spoken in four different tones of voice. There were 128 participants equally divided between left- and right-handers, with equal numbers of each sex within each handedness group. Each participant responded to 144 trials on the dichotic task, and filled in the 32-item Waterloo Handedness Questionnaire. Analysis of false positive responses on the dichotic task (responding "yes" when only the verbal or only the affective component of the target was present, or when both components were present but were at opposite ears) indicated that significantly more errors were made when the verbal aspect of the target appeared at the right ear (left hemisphere) and the emotional aspect was at the left ear (right hemisphere) than when the reverse was the case. A single task has generated both effects, so that differences in participants' strategies or the way in which attention is biased cannot account for the results. While the majority of participants showed a right-ear advantage for verbal material and a left-ear advantage for nonverbal material, these two effects were not correlated, suggesting that independent mechanisms probably underly the establishment of verbal and affective processing. We found no significant sex or handedness effects, though left-handers were much more variable than were right-handers. There were no significant correlations between degree of handedness as measured on the handedness questionnaire and extent of lateralization of verbal or affective processing on the dichotic task. We believe that this general technique may be able to provide information as to the nature and extent of interhemispheric integration of information, and is easily adaptable to other modalities, thus holds great promise for future research.
通过分析要求正常参与者识别以特定语调说出的特定单词(例如,以愉快语调说出的“tower”一词)的错误分数,我们得以在双耳分听任务中证明同时存在的言语和情感性大脑半球偏侧化效应。目标包括四个双音节词以四种不同语调说出的16种可能组合。有128名参与者,左右手习惯者各占一半,每个左右手习惯组内男女数量相等。每位参与者对双耳分听任务进行144次试验,并填写32项的滑铁卢利手问卷。对双耳分听任务中的假阳性反应(当目标仅存在言语成分或仅存在情感成分时,或当两个成分都存在但位于对侧耳朵时回答“是”)的分析表明,当目标的言语方面出现在右耳(左半球)而情感方面出现在左耳(右半球)时,比相反情况时出现的错误明显更多。一个单一任务产生了这两种效应,因此参与者策略的差异或注意力偏向的方式无法解释结果。虽然大多数参与者在言语材料上表现出右耳优势,在非言语材料上表现出左耳优势,但这两种效应并不相关,这表明言语和情感处理的建立可能有独立的机制。我们没有发现显著的性别或利手效应,不过左利手者比右利手者的变异性大得多。在利手问卷上测量的利手程度与双耳分听任务中言语或情感处理的偏侧化程度之间没有显著相关性。我们认为,这种通用技术或许能够提供有关半球间信息整合的性质和程度的信息,并且很容易适应其他模式,因此对未来研究具有很大的前景。