Klebanov P K, Brooks-Gunn J, McCormick M C
Columbia University, Teachers College, New York, NY.
Pediatrics. 1994 Nov;94(5):700-8.
To examine the effect of birth weight on the classroom behavior of children during elementary school (N = 1120; mean age = 9.16 years).
The study used an inception cohort.
SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Participants were from two previously studied multi-site cohorts: very low birth weight (VLBW) children referred to participating intensive care units and heavier low birth weight (HLBW) children from a stratified random sample of births in geographically defined regions. Teacher reports of children's behavior were obtained for 80% of those eligible. Information was obtained for 137 children who were extremely low birth weight (ELBW, < or = 1000 g at birth), 223 who were other very low birth weight (OVLBW, 1001 to 1500 g), 434 who were HLBW (1501 to 2500 g), and 326 who were normal birth weight (NBW, > 2500 g).
The child's teacher provided reports of language and attention in the classroom, behavior problems, and social competence.
Comparisons were made among the four birth weight groups: ELBW, OVLBW, HLBW, and NBW. The ELBW children had lower attention and language skills, overall social competence, scholastic competence, and athletic ability than all other birth weight groups as measured by classroom teachers, even when controlling for neonatal stay, child's gender and ethnicity, and maternal education. All low birth weight (LBW) children had lower attention and language skills and scholastic competence and higher daydreaming and hyperactivity scores than NBW children. White children and children with more educated mothers generally had greater language and attention and social competence scores and fewer behavior problems; girls had fewer behavior problems than boys. Neonatal health was generally not associated with outcomes, except that healthier children had lower anxiety scores. The classroom behavior of LBW (< 2500 g) children was rated by teachers as poor, even for children who had not failed a grade; LBW children who are on grade level still may be at risk for school problems. Differences between ELBW and NBW children persisted for overall language and attention and social competence scores even when additional controls were added for sociodemographic and familial variables. Of these variables, maternal depression and home environment were significantly associated with social competence scores.
研究出生体重对小学阶段儿童课堂行为的影响(N = 1120;平均年龄 = 9.16岁)。
本研究采用初始队列研究。
背景/参与者:参与者来自两个先前研究的多地点队列:入住参与研究的重症监护病房的极低出生体重(VLBW)儿童,以及来自地理区域分层随机抽样出生的较重低出生体重(HLBW)儿童。80%符合条件的儿童的教师提供了其行为报告。获取了137名极 低出生体重(ELBW,出生时体重≤1000克)儿童、223名其他极低出生体重(OVLBW,1001至1500克)儿童、434名低出生体重(HLBW,1501至2500克)儿童和326名正常出生体重(NBW,>2500克)儿童的信息。
儿童的教师提供了关于课堂上语言和注意力、行为问题及社交能力的报告。
对四个出生体重组进行了比较:ELBW、OVLBW、HLBW和NBW。课堂教师评估显示,ELBW儿童在注意力和语言技能、总体社交能力、学业能力及运动能力方面低于所有其他出生体重组,即便在控制了新生儿住院时间、儿童性别和种族以及母亲教育程度之后也是如此。所有低出生体重(LBW)儿童在注意力和语言技能以及学业能力方面低于NBW儿童,且白日梦和多动得分更高。白人儿童以及母亲受教育程度更高的儿童通常在语言、注意力和社交能力方面得分更高,行为问题更少;女孩的行为问题比男孩少。新生儿健康状况一般与结果无关,只是健康状况较好的儿童焦虑得分较低。教师对LBW(<2500克)儿童的课堂行为评价较差,即使对于未留级的儿童也是如此;达到年级水平的LBW儿童仍可能面临学业问题风险。即便增加了社会人口统计学和家庭变量的额外控制因素,ELBW和NBW儿童在总体语言、注意力和社交能力得分方面的差异依然存在。在这些变量中,母亲抑郁和家庭环境与社交能力得分显著相关。