• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

修复材料对乳磨牙修复体存留率的影响。

The influence of restorative material on the survival rate of restorations in primary molars.

作者信息

Papathanasiou A G, Curzon M E, Fairpo C G

机构信息

Department of Child Dental Health, University of Leeds, England.

出版信息

Pediatr Dent. 1994 Jul-Aug;16(4):282-8.

PMID:7937261
Abstract

The survival rates of restorations in primary molars were calculated after a retrospective examination of patients' dental records from a study population of 1,065 children. A random sample of 128 records showing information for 604 dental restorations was examined, coded, and analyzed by the life table method of survival analysis. The order of the survival rate of restorations from higher to lower success was preformed crowns, amalgam, composite resin, and glass ionomer restorations. A highly statistically significant difference (P = 0.0001) was found among the survival success rates of different material restorations. For preformed crowns and amalgam restorations, the median survival time was more than 5 years. The 5-year survival estimate for preformed crowns was 68% and for amalgam restorations was 60%. For composite resin the median survival time was 32 months and the 4-year survival estimate was 40%. For glass ionomer restorations, the median survival time was 12 months and the 4-year survival estimate was 5%.

摘要

在对1065名儿童的研究人群的患者牙科记录进行回顾性检查后,计算了乳磨牙修复体的存活率。随机抽取了128份记录,这些记录显示了604个牙齿修复体的信息,并通过生存分析的寿命表法进行编码和分析。修复体存活率从高到低的顺序为预成冠、银汞合金、复合树脂和玻璃离子修复体。不同材料修复体的生存成功率之间存在高度统计学显著差异(P = 0.0001)。对于预成冠和银汞合金修复体,中位生存时间超过5年。预成冠的5年生存估计率为68%,银汞合金修复体为60%。复合树脂的中位生存时间为32个月,4年生存估计率为40%。对于玻璃离子修复体,中位生存时间为12个月,4年生存估计率为5%。

相似文献

1
The influence of restorative material on the survival rate of restorations in primary molars.修复材料对乳磨牙修复体存留率的影响。
Pediatr Dent. 1994 Jul-Aug;16(4):282-8.
2
Amalgam, composite resin and glass ionomer cement in Class II restorations in primary molars--a three year clinical evaluation.乳牙Ⅱ类洞修复中银汞合金、复合树脂和玻璃离子水门汀——一项为期三年的临床评估
Swed Dent J. 1992;16(3):81-6.
3
Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional cavity preparations for glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars: one-year results.乳牙玻璃离子修复中无创伤性修复治疗与传统窝洞预备的比较:一年期结果。
Quintessence Int. 2002 Jan;33(1):17-21.
4
Longevity of occlusally-stressed restorations in posterior primary teeth.后牙乳牙咬合受力修复体的使用寿命。
Am J Dent. 2005 Jun;18(3):198-211.
5
A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations.一项关于后牙复合树脂和银汞合金修复体使用寿命的回顾性临床研究。
Dent Mater. 2007 Jan;23(1):2-8. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.11.036. Epub 2006 Jan 18.
6
A Retrospective Study of the 3-Year Survival Rate of Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Cement Class II Restorations in Primary Molars.一项关于树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀Ⅱ类洞修复乳磨牙3年生存率的回顾性研究。
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016 Winter;40(1):8-13. doi: 10.17796/1053-4628-40.1.8.
7
Resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations in primary molars.乳牙中的树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀修复体。
Swed Dent J. 1999;23(1):1-9.
8
Clinical aspects of restorative treatment in the primary dentition.乳牙列修复治疗的临床方面。
Swed Dent J Suppl. 1993;96:1-47.
9
Clinical evaluation of glass ionomer-silver cermet restorations in primary molars: one year results.乳牙玻璃离子-银合金金属陶瓷修复体的临床评估:一年结果
J Can Dent Assoc. 1990 Mar;56(3):239-40.
10
A comparison of glass cermet cement and amalgam restorations in primary molars.
ASDC J Dent Child. 1990 May-Jun;57(3):184-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Microbial Evaluation of Plaque on Conventional Stainless Steel Crown and Titanium-coated Stainless Steel Crown on Primary Molars.乳牙上传统不锈钢冠和钛涂层不锈钢冠菌斑的微生物学评估
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024 Sep;17(9):1041-1043. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2731.
2
Investigating the impact of flowable composite liner on the fracture strength and microleakage of large composite resin restorations of primary anterior teeth.研究流动性复合衬垫对前牙大复合树脂修复体的断裂强度和微渗漏的影响。
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2023 Aug;24(4):473-479. doi: 10.1007/s40368-023-00812-3. Epub 2023 Jun 21.
3
Comparing the Fracture Resistance of Dentine Posts and Glass Fiber Posts in Primary Maxillary Incisors: An In Vitro Study.
比较乳牙上颌中切牙中牙本质桩和玻璃纤维桩的抗折性:一项体外研究。
Cureus. 2023 Feb 3;15(2):e34591. doi: 10.7759/cureus.34591. eCollection 2023 Feb.
4
Comparison of Fracture Resistance of Primary Incisors Restored with Different Intracanal-Reinforcement Materials.不同根管内增强材料修复的乳前牙抗折性比较。
Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2021 Dec 3;13:507-512. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S335333. eCollection 2021.
5
Pediatric Stainless-Steel Crown Cementation Finite Element Study.儿童不锈钢冠黏固的有限元研究
Eur J Dent. 2021 Feb;15(1):77-83. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1715915. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
6
Knowledge and Awareness among General Dental Practitioners in Chennai Regarding Rehabilitation with Full Coverage Restoration in Children.钦奈普通牙科从业者对儿童全冠修复康复的认知与了解
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2019 Nov-Dec;12(6):590-594. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1674.
7
A randomized clinical trial comparing Hall vs conventional technique in placing preformed metal crowns from Sudan.来自苏丹的一项比较 Hall 技术与传统技术在预成金属冠修复中应用的随机临床试验
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 3;14(6):e0217740. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217740. eCollection 2019.
8
Longevity of posterior composite and compomer restorations in children placed under different types of anesthesia: a retrospective 5-year study.不同类型麻醉下儿童后牙复合树脂和复合体修复体的寿命:一项回顾性 5 年研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Jan;24(1):141-150. doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-02911-2. Epub 2019 May 3.
9
Clinical assessment of class II resin-based composites versus preformed metal crowns performed on primary molars in patients at high risk of caries.对龋齿高风险患者的乳磨牙进行的基于树脂的II类复合树脂与预成金属冠的临床评估。
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2018 Feb;19(1):39-45. doi: 10.1007/s40368-017-0322-8. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
10
Evaluation of sealing ability two self-etching adhesive systems and a glass ionomer lining LC under composite restoration in primary tooth: An in vitro study.乳牙复合树脂修复中两种自酸蚀粘结系统和玻璃离子衬层LC的封闭能力评价:一项体外研究。
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2015 Aug;7(Suppl 2):S518-23. doi: 10.4103/0975-7406.163525.