Epstein W V
Rosalind Russell Arthritis Center, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco 94143-0920.
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 1994 Jun;23(6 Suppl 2):32-8. doi: 10.1016/0049-0172(94)90082-5.
There are few published reports of the efficacy of slow-acting antirheumatic drugs (SAARDs) specific to the treatment of persons with early rheumatoid arthritis. Two published meta-analyses of the literature on SAARD therapy are reviewed, together with some empirical data on patients with less than 2 years' disease duration treated over an 8-year period. Although the literature suggests short-term benefit of SAARDs compared with placebo therapy, there is little to warrant considering presently available drugs to be disease-remittive agents. Based on known toxicities and purported benefits of available SAARDs, a treatment schema is proposed that responds incrementally to the course of the illness when treatment is started before irreversible joint injury occurs. The advent of new classes of therapeutic agents (eg, biologicals) for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis warrants examination of present methods for the evaluation of antirheumatic drugs.
关于慢作用抗风湿药物(SAARDs)治疗早期类风湿关节炎患者疗效的已发表报告很少。本文回顾了两篇已发表的关于SAARD治疗的文献荟萃分析,以及8年期间对病程小于2年患者的一些经验数据。尽管文献表明与安慰剂治疗相比SAARDs有短期益处,但几乎没有理由认为现有药物是疾病缓解剂。基于现有SAARDs已知的毒性和所谓的益处,提出了一种治疗方案,当在不可逆转的关节损伤发生之前开始治疗时,该方案可根据病程逐步调整。类风湿关节炎治疗新一类治疗药物(如生物制剂)的出现,有必要审视目前抗风湿药物的评估方法。