• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

立体定向乳腺活检足够吗?

Are stereotaxic breast biopsies adequate?

作者信息

Hernandez L E, Connelly P J, Strickler S A, Akers M M, Dunn M M

机构信息

Wright State University, Department of Surgery, Miami Valley Hospital, Dayton, OH 45409.

出版信息

Surgery. 1994 Oct;116(4):610-4; discussion 614-5.

PMID:7940157
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Stereotaxic core breast biopsy (SCBB) has been proposed as a cost-effective and reliable method of evaluating mammographic lesions. This study evaluates an initial experience with SCBB and assesses the adequacy of the biopsy specimens obtained.

METHODS

Two hundred forty-one SCBB were performed on 221 patients during 13 months by four radiologists. Mammograms were assigned a suspicion index on a scale of 1 to 5. One pathologist performed a blinded retrospective review of all SCBB specimens and assigned an adequacy score based on the quality and amount of the tissue present.

RESULTS

The majority of SCBB were ordered by general surgeons (67%). A suspicion index score of 3 was assigned to 74% of lesion specimens. Twelve percent of specimens were malignant. Overall SCBB adequacy (score > or = 2) was 77%. Adequacy was present in 74% of benign biopsy specimens as compared with 100% of malignant specimens (p < 0.005). Only 62% of specimens reported as benign without specific features were adequate. There were no differences in adequacy between individual radiologists or during the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

SCBB is largely used by surgeons to assess indeterminate mammographic lesions. One of four benign specimens was inadequate. Benign SCBB specimens must be interpreted with caution.

摘要

背景

立体定向乳腺核心活检(SCBB)已被提议作为一种评估乳腺钼靶病变的经济有效且可靠的方法。本研究评估了SCBB的初步经验,并评估了所获取活检标本的充足性。

方法

在13个月期间,由四位放射科医生对221例患者进行了241次SCBB。乳腺钼靶检查被赋予1至5级的可疑指数。一位病理学家对所有SCBB标本进行了盲法回顾性审查,并根据所存在组织的质量和数量给出充足性评分。

结果

大多数SCBB是由普通外科医生要求进行的(67%)。74%的病变标本可疑指数评分为3。12%的标本为恶性。总体SCBB充足率(评分≥2)为77%。良性活检标本的充足率为74%,而恶性标本为100%(p<0.005)。报告为无特定特征的良性标本中只有62%是充足的。不同放射科医生之间或研究期间的充足率没有差异。

结论

SCBB主要由外科医生用于评估不确定的乳腺钼靶病变。四分之一的良性标本不充足。对良性SCBB标本的解读必须谨慎。

相似文献

1
Are stereotaxic breast biopsies adequate?立体定向乳腺活检足够吗?
Surgery. 1994 Oct;116(4):610-4; discussion 614-5.
2
Stereotactic core biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions.不可触及乳腺病变的立体定向核心活检
J S C Med Assoc. 1995 Dec;91(12):489-96.
3
[Papillary lesions of the breast: diagnostic imaging and contribution of percutaneous needle biopsy with 14G needle].[乳腺乳头状病变:诊断性影像学检查及14G针经皮穿刺活检的作用]
Radiol Med. 2001 Jun;101(6):424-31.
4
Stereotactic core needle breast biopsy is an accurate diagnostic technique to assess nonpalpable mammographic abnormalities.立体定向乳腺穿刺活检是评估乳腺钼靶检查发现的不可触及异常的一种准确诊断技术。
J La State Med Soc. 1996 Apr;148(4):167-70.
5
In search of specimen adequacy in fine-needle aspirates of nonpalpable breast lesions.探寻不可触及乳腺病变细针穿刺抽吸标本的充足性。
Am J Clin Pathol. 1997 Jul;108(1):13-8.
6
Efficiency of Core Biopsy for BI-RADS-5 Breast Lesions.针对BI-RADS-5级乳腺病变的粗针活检效率
Breast J. 2008 Sep-Oct;14(5):471-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2008.00624.x.
7
Stereotactic core breast biopsy. An alternative.立体定向乳腺粗针活检。一种替代方法。
Va Med Q. 1994 Summer;121(3):179-84.
8
Stereotactic breast biopsy: initial experience and recommendations for improvement.立体定向乳腺活检:初步经验及改进建议
Nebr Med J. 1993 Dec;78(12):380-2.
9
Follow-up recommendations for benign breast biopsies.乳腺良性活检的随访建议。
Breast J. 2006 Sep-Oct;12(5):413-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1075-122X.2006.00302.x.
10
MR-guided stereotactic breast biopsy: technical aspects and preliminary results.磁共振引导下的立体定向乳腺活检:技术要点与初步结果
Radiol Med. 2003 Sep;106(3):232-44.

引用本文的文献

1
When can stereotactic core biopsy replace excisional biopsy?--A clinical perspective.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1995;36(1):1-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00690179.