• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

保密单位排除选项的有效性。

The effectiveness of the confidential unit exclusion option.

作者信息

Petersen L R, Lackritz E, Lewis W F, Smith D S, Herrera G, Raimondi V, Aberle-Grasse J, Dodd R Y

机构信息

Division of HIV/AIDS, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.

出版信息

Transfusion. 1994 Oct;34(10):865-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1994.341095026971.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1537-2995.1994.341095026971.x
PMID:7940657
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The confidential unit exclusion (CUE) option is intended to reduce human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmission by excluding donors newly infected with HIV who have not yet developed HIV antibody (window-period donors); however, its efficacy in excluding window-period donors has not been evaluated.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

The use of the CUE option was studied among the donors of 3.7 million units at 18 American Red Cross blood services regions during 1991 and 1992 and among 322 previously HIV-1-seronegative donors who subsequently donated a seropositive unit between 1987 and 1990 at 40 United States blood centers. These seroconverting donors had previously been shown to be highly likely to donate during their window period.

RESULTS

On the basis of data from these two populations, it was estimated that only 3 to 5 percent of units donated by window-period donors were not transfused because of the CUE option, that 0.4 percent of all donations were from donors who confidentially excluded their blood from transfusion, and that donors who confidentially excluded their blood were 21 times more likely to be HIV antibody-positive than donors who did not use the CUE option. It is estimated that, if all US blood centers used the CUE option, a total of 2 to 17 otherwise acceptable units donated by window-period donors would not be transfused annually.

CONCLUSION

Although donors who confidentially exclude their blood from transfusion are 21 times more likely to have HIV antibody, the rarity of window-period donors and the infrequency of confidential exclusion by window-period donors cause the CUE option to have minimal impact on transfusion safety.

摘要

背景

保密单位排除(CUE)选项旨在通过排除新感染人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)但尚未产生HIV抗体的献血者(窗口期献血者)来减少HIV传播;然而,其在排除窗口期献血者方面的效果尚未得到评估。

研究设计与方法

1991年和1992年期间,在美国红十字会18个血液服务区域的370万单位献血者中研究了CUE选项的使用情况,以及在40个美国血液中心1987年至1990年期间322名先前HIV-1血清学阴性、随后捐献了血清学阳性单位的献血者中研究了该选项的使用情况。这些血清转化献血者此前已被证明在窗口期很有可能献血。

结果

根据这两个人群的数据估计,由于CUE选项,窗口期献血者捐献的单位中只有3%至5%未被输注,所有捐献中0.4%来自保密排除其血液用于输注的献血者,且保密排除其血液的献血者HIV抗体呈阳性的可能性是未使用CUE选项的献血者的21倍。据估计,如果美国所有血液中心都使用CUE选项,每年将有2至17个原本可接受的由窗口期献血者捐献的单位不会被输注。

结论

尽管保密排除其血液用于输注的献血者HIV抗体呈阳性的可能性是其他献血者的21倍,但窗口期献血者罕见,且窗口期献血者保密排除的情况很少,导致CUE选项对输血安全的影响微乎其微。

相似文献

1
The effectiveness of the confidential unit exclusion option.保密单位排除选项的有效性。
Transfusion. 1994 Oct;34(10):865-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1994.341095026971.x.
2
Demographic characteristics and prevalence of serologic markers among donors who use the confidential unit exclusion process: the Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study.采用保密单位排除程序的献血者的人口统计学特征及血清学标志物流行情况:逆转录病毒流行病学献血者研究
Transfusion. 1994 Oct;34(10):870-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1994.341095026972.x.
3
Current impact of the confidential unit exclusion option.
Transfusion. 2004 May;44(5):651-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2004.03311.x.
4
Confidential unit exclusion (CUE): Double edged sword for blood transfusion center: A ten-year study on volunteer blood donors in Kohgiluyeh and Boyer Ahmad province, Iran.保密单位排除(CUE):输血中心的双刃剑:对伊朗科吉卢耶-博韦艾哈迈德省志愿献血者的十年研究
Transfus Clin Biol. 2019 Nov;26(4):253-256. doi: 10.1016/j.tracli.2019.05.002. Epub 2019 May 11.
5
Estimated rate of HIV-1-infectious but seronegative blood donations in Bangkok, Thailand.泰国曼谷HIV-1感染但血清学阴性献血的估计比率。
AIDS. 1996 Sep;10(10):1157-62.
6
Evaluation of the confidential unit exclusion form: the Canadian Blood Services experience.《保密性单位排除表评估:加拿大血液服务经验》。
Vox Sang. 2010 Feb;98(2):138-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2009.01236.x. Epub 2009 Sep 14.
7
Duration of time from onset of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infectiousness to development of detectable antibody. The HIV Seroconversion Study Group.从1型人类免疫缺陷病毒感染开始到可检测到抗体出现的时间。HIV血清转化研究组。
Transfusion. 1994 Apr;34(4):283-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1994.34494233574.x.
8
Estimated risk of transmission of the human immunodeficiency virus by screened blood in the United States.美国经筛查血液传播人类免疫缺陷病毒的估计风险。
N Engl J Med. 1995 Dec 28;333(26):1721-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199512283332601.
9
Exposure of patients to human immunodeficiency virus through the transfusion of blood components that test antibody-negative.患者因输注抗体检测呈阴性的血液成分而接触人类免疫缺陷病毒。
N Engl J Med. 1989 Oct 5;321(14):941-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198910053211405.
10
Evaluation of 6 years of confidential unit exclusion at the Belgian Red Cross Flanders Blood Service.对比利时红十字会佛兰德血液服务中心6年保密单位排除情况的评估。
Vox Sang. 2014 May;106(4):354-60. doi: 10.1111/vox.12115. Epub 2013 Nov 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Subjective donor deferral as a tool for increased blood transfusion safety: A cross-sectional observational study.将主观的献血者延期作为提高输血安全性的一种手段:一项横断面观察性研究。
Health Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 14;4(4):e424. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.424. eCollection 2021 Dec.
2
Evaluation of the confidential unit exclusion on Iranian blood donors: An 11-year experience.伊朗献血者保密单位排除情况评估:11年经验总结
Asian J Transfus Sci. 2021 Jan-Jun;15(1):57-61. doi: 10.4103/ajts.AJTS_152_18. Epub 2021 Jun 12.
3
Comments on confidential unit exclusion at the Regional Blood bank in Montes Claros - Fundação Hemominas.
关于蒙特斯克拉鲁斯地区血库(Hemominas基金会)保密单位排除的评论
Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter. 2012;34(1):6-7. doi: 10.5581/1516-8484.20120004.
4
Effectiveness of confidential unit exclusion in screening blood donors of the regional blood bank in Londrina, Paraná State.保密单位排除法在巴拉那州隆德里纳地区血库献血者筛查中的有效性。
Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter. 2011;33(5):347-52. doi: 10.5581/1516-8484.20110097.
5
Effectiveness of confidential unit exclusion for screening blood donors.保密单位排除法用于筛查献血者的有效性。
Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter. 2011;33(5):330-1. doi: 10.5581/1516-8484.20110091.
6
Confidential donation confirmation as an alternative to confidential unit exclusion: 15 months experience of the HEMOMINAS foundation.作为保密单位排除的替代方案的保密捐赠确认:HEMOMINAS基金会15个月的经验
Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter. 2011;33(4):263-7. doi: 10.5581/1516-8484.20110074.
7
Confidential donation confirmation as a alternative exclusion.作为一种替代排除方式的保密捐赠确认。
Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter. 2011;33(4):251-2. doi: 10.5581/1516-8484.20110068.
8
Efficacy of the confidential unit exclusion option in blood donors in tehran, iran, determined by using the nucleic Acid testing method in 2008 and 2009.2008年和2009年采用核酸检测方法确定伊朗德黑兰献血者保密单位排除选项的效果。
Hepat Mon. 2011 Nov;11(11):907-12. doi: 10.5812/kowsar.1735143X.778. Epub 2011 Nov 30.
9
Comparison of the prevalence of major transfusion-transmitted infections among Iranian blood donors using confidential unit exclusion in an Iranian population: Transfusion-transmitted infections among Iranian blood donors.在伊朗人群中使用保密单位排除法比较伊朗献血者中主要输血传播感染的流行率:伊朗献血者中的输血传播感染
Hepat Mon. 2011 Jan;11(1):11-3.
10
Positivity of HIV, hepatitis B and hepatitis C in patients enrolled in a confidential self-exclusion system of blood donation: a cross-sectional analytical study.参与献血保密自我排除系统的患者中艾滋病毒、乙型肝炎和丙型肝炎的阳性情况:一项横断面分析研究。
Sao Paulo Med J. 2010 Dec;128(6):320-3. doi: 10.1590/s1516-31802010000600002.