Suppr超能文献

[脑肿瘤立体定向活检与内镜活检的结果及可靠性]

[Results and reliability of stereotactic and endoscopic biopsies in brain tumors].

作者信息

Mennel H D, Hellwig D, Bauer B L

机构信息

Abteilung für Neuropathologie, Medizinisches Zentrum für Pathologie, Philipps-Universität Marburg.

出版信息

Zentralbl Neurochir. 1994;55(2):79-90.

PMID:7941830
Abstract

Stereotactic neurosurgery was the first "minimal invasive method" in the field of neurosurgery, later followed and partly replaced by endoscopic techniques. One reason for such an approach is sampling of small tissue probes for diagnosis, e.g. in brain tumours not accessible to open surgery. The appropriate method in the hands of the experienced is the "Quetsch" or smear technique. Its reliability is limited by the fact, that the "architectural" or "tissular" components of tumours lack in those purely cytological preparations. Tissue architecture however is crucial for the assessment of different grades in glial tumour progression. The grade of a glial tumour is the most critical information for the patient and the therapist; grading of the supratentorialf gliomas of the adult by means of cellular and tissue pleomorphism therefore forms the basis of Zülchs system of classification and grading of all intracranial tumours by comparison of postoperative survival. The resulting four grade system--slightly modified--is part of the old and new issue of the WHO classification of brain tumours. In order to specify the possibility of correct diagnosis and grading in probes gained by the minimal invasive techniques, we present results of three diagnostic approaches: First: We report results of a study performed during the last twelve years in which a diagnosis of smear preparations had been made on neurosurgical specimens prior to conventional handling. The "blind" cytological diagnosis was then compared with the final diagnosis of the tumour using light and electron microscopy and immunohistochemistry. Second: We report results and estimates of tissue probes gained by the so called sandwich technique in which the removal of material for cytological analysis is done stepwise. By doing so, material representative for different compartments of the neoplasm is obtained. This implies collaboration between neurosurgeon and neuropathologist not only during the time of stereotactic action but also in the planing period; the correct interpretation of the different compartments delivered by imaging methods in this context is essential. Third: We present selected cases of probe sampling under direct visual control by endoscopy. This method is especially useful for tumours bordering the ventricular system. Surface structures and cyst linings can be visualized directly if the endoscopist is familiar with normal and pathological tissue appearance. The specimen for analysis may therefore be taken from the most relevant tumour region and the sandwich technic which means tissue damaging in multiple localisations can be partly or fully avoided.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

摘要

立体定向神经外科手术是神经外科领域的首个“微创方法”,后来被内镜技术追随并部分取代。采用这种方法的一个原因是对小组织探针进行取样以用于诊断,例如在开颅手术无法触及的脑肿瘤中。对于经验丰富的人来说,合适的方法是“压片”或涂片技术。其可靠性受到以下事实的限制,即在那些纯粹的细胞学制剂中缺乏肿瘤的“结构”或“组织”成分。然而,组织结构对于评估胶质肿瘤进展的不同级别至关重要。胶质肿瘤的级别是对患者和治疗师而言最关键的信息;因此,通过细胞和组织多形性对成人幕上胶质瘤进行分级,构成了齐尔希通过比较术后生存率对所有颅内肿瘤进行分类和分级系统的基础。由此产生的四级系统(略有修改)是世界卫生组织脑肿瘤分类新旧版本的一部分。为了明确通过微创技术获取的探针进行正确诊断和分级的可能性,我们展示三种诊断方法的结果:第一:我们报告过去十二年进行的一项研究的结果,在该研究中,在常规处理之前对神经外科标本进行了涂片制剂诊断。然后将“盲法”细胞学诊断与使用光学显微镜、电子显微镜和免疫组织化学对肿瘤的最终诊断进行比较。第二:我们报告通过所谓的夹心技术获得的组织探针的结果和评估,在该技术中,用于细胞学分析的材料是逐步获取的。通过这样做,可以获得代表肿瘤不同区域的材料。这意味着神经外科医生和神经病理学家不仅在立体定向操作期间而且在规划阶段都需要合作;在这种情况下,对成像方法提供的不同区域进行正确解读至关重要。第三:我们展示在内镜直接视觉控制下进行探针取样的选定病例。这种方法对于与脑室系统相邻的肿瘤特别有用。如果内镜医生熟悉正常和病理组织外观,表面结构和囊肿内衬可以直接可视化。因此,用于分析的标本可以取自最相关的肿瘤区域,并且可以部分或完全避免意味着在多个部位造成组织损伤的夹心技术。(摘要截取自400字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验