Santi M D, Richardson A B
Division of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Hawaii, Honolulu 96813.
Am J Sports Med. 1994 Jul-Aug;22(4):524-30. doi: 10.1177/036354659402200415.
Twenty-eight patients who had reconstructions of the anterior cruciate ligament with a ligament augmentation device in the semitendinosus and gracilis tendons were compared with 32 patients who had reconstructions with semitendinosus and gracilis tendons alone. Preoperatively, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups with respect to age, sex, Tegner activity level, and time from injury to operation. Mean postoperative followup was 31.4 months for the augmentation group and 32.3 months for the nonaugmentation group. At postoperative evaluation, there was no difference in the 2 groups with respect to Lysholm knee scores, return to activity as measured by Tegner levels, KT-1000 arthrometer laxity testing, presence of pivot shift or Lachman sign, range of motion, and the patient's subjective overall rating of the surgery. Twenty-six of the 28 patients (93%) with augmentation rated their results as either "good" or "excellent" compared with 30 of the 32 patients (94%) with no ligament augmentation who rated their results as good or excellent. Four patients with the ligament augmentation devices needed reoperation for recurrent effusions and pain. No patients in the nonaugmentation group had recurrent effusions.
28例采用半腱肌和股薄肌腱联合韧带增强装置重建前交叉韧带的患者与32例仅采用半腱肌和股薄肌腱重建的患者进行了比较。术前,两组在年龄、性别、Tegner活动水平以及受伤至手术的时间方面无显著差异。增强组术后平均随访31.4个月,非增强组术后平均随访32.3个月。术后评估时,两组在Lysholm膝关节评分、以Tegner水平衡量的恢复活动情况、KT-1000关节测径仪松弛度测试、有无轴移或Lachman征、活动范围以及患者对手术的主观总体评价方面均无差异。28例采用增强装置的患者中有26例(93%)将其结果评为“良好”或“优秀”,而32例未采用韧带增强的患者中有30例(94%)将其结果评为良好或优秀。4例采用韧带增强装置的患者因反复出现积液和疼痛需要再次手术。非增强组没有患者出现反复积液。