Suppr超能文献

体外冲击波碎石术:当前进展

ESWL: current aspects.

作者信息

Schmidt A S, Eisenberger F

机构信息

Department of Urology, Katharinenhospital, Stuttgart, Germany.

出版信息

Arch Esp Urol. 1994 Jul-Aug;47(6):637-41.

PMID:7944612
Abstract

Ten years after the first application, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) has gained world-wide acceptance as first choice therapy of urinary calculi. The introduction of different shock wave sources, shock wave coupling and imaging techniques have influenced treatment comfort, need of anesthesia, and costs of the device, but did not improve efficacy of treatment regarding complete disintegration of calculi without need for secondary treatments. Therefore the optimal device for lithotripsy providing high efficacy, no need for anesthesia, and inducing minimal tissue trauma has not been found yet. ESWL represents first choice therapy of ureteral stones without prior endoscopic manipulations. Under the conditions of fluoroscopic imaging and high shock wave energy stone-free rates up to 90% can be achieved. For the treatment of staghorn stones ESWL-monotherapy seems to be suitable for smaller calculi only, while larger stone burden classified by surface area calculation represents an indication for initial percutaneous approach. Although with both methods complete stone clearance cannot be achieved in more than 80% of cases, relief of symptoms and infection occurs more likely.

摘要

首次应用体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)十年后,它已作为尿石症的首选治疗方法在全球范围内得到认可。不同冲击波源、冲击波耦合和成像技术的引入影响了治疗舒适度、麻醉需求和设备成本,但在无需二次治疗即可实现结石完全碎裂方面,并未提高治疗效果。因此,尚未找到提供高效、无需麻醉且能使组织创伤最小化的最佳碎石设备。ESWL是输尿管结石未经预先内镜操作时的首选治疗方法。在荧光透视成像和高冲击波能量的条件下,结石清除率可达90%。对于鹿角形结石的治疗,ESWL单一疗法似乎仅适用于较小的结石,而按表面积计算结石负荷较大则表明应首选经皮治疗方法。尽管使用这两种方法,超过80%的病例无法实现结石完全清除,但更有可能缓解症状和控制感染。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验