• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[TNM系统中食管癌分类的补充形态学标准F和G]

[Supplementary morphological criteria F anf G in the classification of esophageal cancer by the TNM system].

作者信息

Kolosov A E, Dovgaliuk A Z, Stoliarov V I

出版信息

Arkh Patol. 1993 May-Jun;55(3):58-62.

PMID:7944972
Abstract

Additional criteria are introduced for the prognosis of esophageal carcinoma: anatomical form of growth (F) and the degree of carcinoma differentiation (G). These conclusions are drawn basing on long-term results of treatment of 302 patients. These additional criteria help to make a proper choice of treatment. The best results may be expected under the following combination--T1P1-2N0M0F1G1, 5-year survival in these patients was 69.8%. Unfavourable results were in the group of radically treated patients with the following combination T3P3N1M0F1-3G3bv, 5-year survival being 7.8% only.

摘要

引入了食管癌预后的附加标准

生长的解剖形态(F)和癌分化程度(G)。这些结论是基于对302例患者的长期治疗结果得出的。这些附加标准有助于做出恰当的治疗选择。在以下组合情况下可能预期有最佳结果——T1P1 - 2N0M0F1G1,这些患者的5年生存率为69.8%。对于接受根治性治疗且具有以下组合T3P3N1M0F1 - 3G3bv的患者组,结果不佳,5年生存率仅为7.8%。

相似文献

1
[Supplementary morphological criteria F anf G in the classification of esophageal cancer by the TNM system].[TNM系统中食管癌分类的补充形态学标准F和G]
Arkh Patol. 1993 May-Jun;55(3):58-62.
2
[Surgical treatment of primary adenocarcinoma of the esophagus].
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 1990 Sep;12(5):371-3.
3
Multifocal neoplasia and nodal metastases in T1 esophageal carcinoma: implications for endoscopic treatment.T1期食管癌的多灶性肿瘤形成和淋巴结转移:对内镜治疗的影响
Ann Surg. 2008 Mar;247(3):434-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318163a2ff.
4
[Prognostic evaluation of squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus].[食管癌鳞状细胞癌的预后评估]
Sov Med. 1991(10):68-9.
5
The prognostic significance of lymph node micrometastasis in patients with esophageal carcinoma.食管癌患者淋巴结微转移的预后意义。
Cancer. 1999 Nov 1;86(9):1883-5.
6
Does the TNM staging system for esophageal cancer need revision?食管癌的TNM分期系统需要修订吗?
J Am Coll Surg. 2006 May;202(5):855-6; author reply 856. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.02.005.
7
Developing an appropriate staging system for esophageal carcinoma.开发一种适用于食管癌的分期系统。
J Am Coll Surg. 2005 Dec;201(6):884-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.07.002. Epub 2005 Oct 10.
8
Prognostic factors for the survival of patients with esophageal carcinoma in the U.S.: the importance of tumor length and lymph node status.美国食管癌患者生存的预后因素:肿瘤长度和淋巴结状态的重要性。
Cancer. 2002 Oct 1;95(7):1434-43. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10868.
9
Improving the accuracy of TNM staging in esophageal cancer: a pathological review of resected specimens.提高食管癌TNM分期的准确性:对切除标本的病理学回顾
Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Dec;15(12):3447-58. doi: 10.1245/s10434-008-0155-0. Epub 2008 Oct 1.
10
Appraisal of a revised lymph node classification system for esophageal squamous cell cancer.对食管癌鳞状细胞癌淋巴结分类系统修订版的评估。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 Apr;83(4):1265-72. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.12.003.