Jansen H, Hop W, van Tol A, Bruschke A V, Birkenhäger J C
Department of Internal Medicine III, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Atherosclerosis. 1994 May;107(1):45-54. doi: 10.1016/0021-9150(94)90140-6.
The influence of hepatic lipase (HL) and lipoprotein lipase (LPL) activity on the low density lipoprotein (LDL) subclass pattern was studied in a population of males with coronary heart disease and without severe hypercholesterolemia. LDL subclass patterns, lipases and plasma lipoproteins were determined in 326 patients. In part of the study population, fasting insulin and glucose levels were also determined. The LDL subclass pattern was determined by gradient gel electrophoresis (GGE) and classified according to Austin et al. (J. Am. Med. Assoc. 260 (1988) 1917 (predominantly large LDL = A-pattern, predominantly small LDL = B-pattern). An LDL subclass A-pattern was exhibited by 199 subjects; 108 exhibited a B-pattern. In 19 subjects no distinctive A- or B-pattern was present (A/B-pattern). Hepatic and lipoprotein activities differed significantly between patients with the A- or B-pattern. The median hepatic lipase activity was lower (384 vs. 417 mU/ml, P = 0.006), and the lipoprotein lipase activity higher (122 vs. 101 mU/ml, P = 0.001) in the A-pattern subjects than in the B-pattern subjects. In subjects with the A/B pattern the lipase activities were intermediate between the values in the A- and B-pattern subjects (HL 408 +/- 87 mU/ml, LPL 115 +/- 55 mU/ml). Plasma triglyceride, very low density lipoprotein (VLDL)-triglyceride, intermediate density lipoprotein (IDL)-triglyceride and LDL-triglyceride were higher in the patients with a B-pattern (+84%, +171%, +10% and +16%, respectively). Total plasma cholesterol was not different between A- and B-pattern subjects. VLDL- and IDL-cholesterol were higher in the B-pattern group (+174% and +66%, respectively), while LDL- and HDL-cholesterol were higher in the A-pattern group (+2 and +24%, respectively). In univariate analysis HL, LPL, plasma (and VLDL) triglyceride, HDL-cholesterol and IDL-cholesterol were each significantly associated with the LDL subclass pattern. In multivariate analysis plasma triglyceride (or VLDL-triglyceride) and HDL-cholesterol appeared to be independently associated with the LDL subclass pattern. No additional discriminative value of HL or LPL was found. Similar results were obtained if the patients with or without beta blocker were evaluated separately. An estimate of insulin resistance (EIR), calculated from plasma insulin and glucose in part of the study population (n = 145), was significantly higher in the subjects with a B-pattern than in those with an A-pattern (3.12 vs. 2.00, P < 0.003). EIR correlated positively with plasma triglyceride (P < 0.0001), but not with HL or LPL.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
在一群患有冠心病且无严重高胆固醇血症的男性中,研究了肝脂酶(HL)和脂蛋白脂酶(LPL)活性对低密度脂蛋白(LDL)亚类模式的影响。对326例患者测定了LDL亚类模式、脂酶和血浆脂蛋白。在部分研究人群中,还测定了空腹胰岛素和血糖水平。通过梯度凝胶电泳(GGE)确定LDL亚类模式,并根据奥斯汀等人的方法进行分类(《美国医学会杂志》260(1988)1917(主要为大LDL = A模式,主要为小LDL = B模式)。199名受试者呈现LDL亚类A模式;108名呈现B模式。19名受试者不存在明显的A或B模式(A/B模式)。A模式或B模式患者的肝和脂蛋白活性存在显著差异。A模式受试者的肝脂酶活性中位数较低(384对417 mU/ml,P = 0.006),而脂蛋白脂酶活性较高(122对101 mU/ml,P = 0.001),高于B模式受试者。A/B模式受试者的脂酶活性介于A模式和B模式受试者的值之间(HL 408±87 mU/ml,LPL 115±55 mU/ml)。B模式患者的血浆甘油三酯、极低密度脂蛋白(VLDL)-甘油三酯、中间密度脂蛋白(IDL)-甘油三酯和LDL-甘油三酯较高(分别升高84%、171%、10%和16%)。A模式和B模式受试者的总血浆胆固醇无差异。B模式组的VLDL和IDL胆固醇较高(分别升高174%和66%),而A模式组的LDL和HDL胆固醇较高(分别升高2%和24%)。在单变量分析中,HL、LPL、血浆(和VLDL)甘油三酯、HDL胆固醇和IDL胆固醇均与LDL亚类模式显著相关。在多变量分析中,血浆甘油三酯(或VLDL-甘油三酯)和HDL胆固醇似乎与LDL亚类模式独立相关。未发现HL或LPL有额外的鉴别价值。对使用或未使用β受体阻滞剂的患者分别进行评估,得到了类似的结果。在部分研究人群(n = 145)中,根据血浆胰岛素和葡萄糖计算的胰岛素抵抗估计值(EIR),B模式受试者显著高于A模式受试者(3.12对2.00,P < 0.003)。EIR与血浆甘油三酯呈正相关(P < 0.0001),但与HL或LPL无关。(摘要截断于400字)