Gemmill J D, Hogg K J, Dunn F G, Rae A P, Hillis W S
Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, University of Glasgow, Western Infirmary.
Br Heart J. 1994 Sep;72(3):222-5. doi: 10.1136/hrt.72.3.222.
To evaluate the influence of pretreatment streptokinase resistance titre and the concentration of IgG antibodies to streptokinase on the efficacy of thrombolytic drugs containing streptokinase in restoring coronary patency in acute myocardial infarction.
Comparative observational study.
City general hospital.
One hundred and twenty four previously unexposed patients presenting within six hours of onset of acute myocardial infarction.
Streptokinase, 1.5 MIU as intravenous infusion over 60 minutes (60 patients), or anistreplase, 30 units as intravenous injection over five minutes (64 patients).
Pretreatment streptokinase resistance titre and concentration of IgG antibodies to streptokinase were measured in 96 and 124 patients respectively and coronary patency assessed angiographically at 90 minutes and 24 hours.
Pretreatment streptokinase resistance titre and concentrations of IgG antibodies to streptokinase were low and skewed towards higher values. Those patients with coronary occlusion at 24 hours had a significantly higher median streptokinase resistance titre (100 v 50 streptokinase IU ml-1, P = 0.02). There were trends towards a higher streptokinase resistance titre in those patients with coronary occlusion at 90 minutes (50 v 20 streptokinase IU ml-1, P = 0.06) and higher concentrations of IgG antibodies to streptokinase in those with coronary occlusion at both 90 minutes and 24 hours (1.53 v 0.925, P = 0.03; 1.65 v 1.04 micrograms streptokinase binding ml-1, P = 0.06). Coronary patency rates were similar in the two treatment groups.
In the range measured in previously unexposed patients the streptokinase resistance titre has a small, but significant, negative influence on the efficacy of streptokinase and anistreplase. This effect should be considered if retreatment with streptokinase or anistreplase is proposed.
评估急性心肌梗死患者溶栓前链激酶抵抗滴度及抗链激酶IgG抗体浓度对含链激酶溶栓药物恢复冠状动脉通畅疗效的影响。
比较性观察研究。
城市综合医院。
124例急性心肌梗死发病6小时内就诊且此前未接触过相关治疗的患者。
链激酶,150万国际单位静脉输注60分钟(60例患者);或茴香酰化纤溶酶原链激酶激活剂复合物,30单位静脉注射5分钟(64例患者)。
分别检测96例和124例患者的溶栓前链激酶抵抗滴度及抗链激酶IgG抗体浓度,并于90分钟和24小时行血管造影评估冠状动脉通畅情况。
溶栓前链激酶抵抗滴度及抗链激酶IgG抗体浓度较低且呈高值偏态分布。24小时时冠状动脉仍闭塞的患者,其链激酶抵抗滴度中位数显著更高(100对50链激酶国际单位/毫升,P = 0.02)。90分钟时冠状动脉闭塞的患者有链激酶抵抗滴度升高的趋势(50对20链激酶国际单位/毫升,P = 0.06),90分钟和24小时时冠状动脉闭塞的患者抗链激酶IgG抗体浓度均较高(1.53对0.925,P = 0.03;1.65对1.04微克链激酶结合/毫升,P = 0.06)。两个治疗组的冠状动脉通畅率相似。
在未接触过相关治疗的患者所测范围内,链激酶抵抗滴度对链激酶和茴香酰化纤溶酶原链激酶激活剂复合物的疗效有微小但显著的负面影响。若提议再次使用链激酶或茴香酰化纤溶酶原链激酶激活剂复合物治疗,应考虑这一效应。