Long B L
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1994;22(2):195-203.
Forty-four women and three men who were plaintiffs in sexual harassment and sexual discrimination cases were evaluated by experts for the plaintiffs and by the author, an expert in these cases, for the defense. There were considerable differences in the diagnostic assessments. Some reasons for these differences and their implications for forensic evaluations are discussed.
44名女性和3名男性作为性骚扰和性别歧视案件的原告,由原告方专家以及作为此类案件专家的作者(代表被告方)进行了评估。诊断评估存在相当大的差异。本文讨论了造成这些差异的一些原因及其对法医评估的影响。