Suppr超能文献

全细胞百日咳疫苗和无细胞百日咳疫苗。

Whole-cell and acellular pertussis vaccines.

作者信息

Wintermeyer S M, Nahata M C, Kyllonen K S

机构信息

Ohio State University, Columbus.

出版信息

Ann Pharmacother. 1994 Jul-Aug;28(7-8):925-39. doi: 10.1177/106002809402800718.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To provide a review of pertussis vaccines, including information on efficacy, adverse reactions, and antibody production following administration of both whole-cell and acellular pertussis vaccines.

DATA SOURCES

A MEDLINE search and extensive review of journals was conducted to identify the information for this review.

DATA EXTRACTION

Pertinent studies reporting experience with pertussis vaccinations were reviewed.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The differences in efficacy, adverse reactions, and antibody responses between whole-cell and acellular pertussis vaccines are emphasized. The status of acellular pertussis vaccination in the US is defined.

CONCLUSIONS

Acellular (chemically detoxified or recombinant) pertussis vaccine formulation appears to cause fewer adverse reactions than whole-cell vaccine in most studies. Clinical efficacy and safety in the very young has not been well established. Thus, acellular pertussis vaccine is reserved for the 4th and 5th doses in the US. Oral or intranasal formulations of the pertussis vaccine are being evaluated.

摘要

目的

综述百日咳疫苗,包括全细胞百日咳疫苗和无细胞百日咳疫苗接种后的疗效、不良反应及抗体产生情况的信息。

数据来源

进行了MEDLINE检索并广泛查阅期刊以获取本综述所需信息。

数据提取

对报告百日咳疫苗接种经验的相关研究进行了综述。

数据综合

强调了全细胞百日咳疫苗和无细胞百日咳疫苗在疗效、不良反应及抗体反应方面的差异。明确了美国无细胞百日咳疫苗的接种现状。

结论

在大多数研究中,无细胞(化学解毒或重组)百日咳疫苗配方似乎比全细胞疫苗引起的不良反应更少。在婴幼儿中的临床疗效和安全性尚未得到充分证实。因此,在美国无细胞百日咳疫苗仅用于第4剂和第5剂接种。正在评估百日咳疫苗的口服或鼻内给药制剂。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验