• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用有用性量表解释信息技术的使用:与用户年龄的比较。

Explaining information technology use with the usefulness scale: a comparison with user age.

作者信息

Kattan M W, Adams D A

机构信息

Department of Urology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston.

出版信息

Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1994:81-5.

PMID:7950037
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2247968/
Abstract

Understanding and predicting the use of information technology is an important problem in healthcare management. The relationships among user characteristics and information technology have generally been weak. This paper describes a recently developed scale that measures perceived usefulness of information technology. Following this description, the scale is compared with user age in ability to explain information technology use. The results suggest perceived usefulness explains a significant proportion of the variance in use (r2 = .13, p < or = 0.0001), while age was not a significant predictor. Implications and suggestions for use of the usefulness scale are discussed.

摘要

理解和预测信息技术的使用是医疗管理中的一个重要问题。用户特征与信息技术之间的关系通常较弱。本文描述了一种最近开发的衡量信息技术感知有用性的量表。在此描述之后,将该量表与用户年龄在解释信息技术使用能力方面进行了比较。结果表明,感知有用性解释了使用差异中的很大一部分(r2 = .13,p ≤ 0.0001),而年龄不是一个显著的预测因素。文中讨论了使用该有用性量表的意义和建议。

相似文献

1
Explaining information technology use with the usefulness scale: a comparison with user age.用有用性量表解释信息技术的使用:与用户年龄的比较。
Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1994:81-5.
2
Adoption in its own time. Forget about pushing physicians to adopt IT, a number of external factors will ensure technology is eventually embraced.适时采用。别再想着催促医生采用信息技术了,一些外部因素将确保技术最终会被接受。
Healthc Inform. 2008 Mar;25(3):58-60.
3
Capitation rebound spurred by use of information technology, greater acceptance by physicians.
Capitation Manag Rep. 2004 Oct;11(10):111-4.
4
Predictive factors of telemedicine service acceptance and behavioral intention of physicians.预测医师接受远程医疗服务和行为意向的因素。
Int J Med Inform. 2014 Aug;83(8):559-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.05.005. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
5
Clinical automation in the physician office. FOCUS: e-Prescribing/Ambulatory EMR 2005.医师办公室中的临床自动化。重点:电子处方/门诊电子病历2005年
Healthc Q. 2005;8(3):115-8.
6
An investigation on physicians' acceptance of hospital information systems: a case study.医生对医院信息系统的接受度调查:案例研究。
Int J Med Inform. 2012 Dec;81(12):810-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.05.003. Epub 2012 May 29.
7
The computer revolution snags some physicians in & out of the office: it's time to recognize the new era of the techno docs.
Hosp Health Netw. 1995 Mar 20;69(6):68-70.
8
The role of information technology usage in physician practice satisfaction.信息技术使用在医师执业满意度中的作用。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2009 Oct-Dec;34(4):364-71. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0b013e3181a90d53.
9
Determinants of physicians' technology acceptance for e-health in ambulatory care.门诊医疗中影响医生接受电子健康技术的因素。
Int J Med Inform. 2012 Nov;81(11):746-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.02.002. Epub 2012 Mar 6.
10
Healthcare professionals' use of health clouds: Integrating technology acceptance and status quo bias perspectives.医疗保健专业人员对健康云的使用:整合技术接受和现状偏差观点。
Int J Med Inform. 2015 Jul;84(7):512-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.03.004. Epub 2015 Mar 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Physician inpatient order writing on microcomputer workstations. Effects on resource utilization.医生在微型计算机工作站上书写住院医嘱。对资源利用的影响。
JAMA. 1993 Jan 20;269(3):379-83.
2
Health science information management and continuing education of physicians. A survey of U.S. primary care practitioners and their opinion leaders.健康科学信息管理与医生继续教育。对美国初级保健从业者及其意见领袖的一项调查。
Ann Intern Med. 1989 Jan 15;110(2):151-60. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-110-2-151.
3
Computers in clinical medicine, a critical review.
Comput Biomed Res. 1977 Jun;10(3):199-204. doi: 10.1016/0010-4809(77)90036-2.