• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对MEDLINE中预爆和副标题与方法学检索词进行定量比较。

Quantitative comparison of pre-explosions and subheadings with methodologic search terms in MEDLINE.

作者信息

Wilczynski N L, Walker C J, McKibbon K A, Haynes R B

机构信息

Dept. of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont., Canada.

出版信息

Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1994:905-9.

PMID:7950055
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2247768/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the retrieval characteristics of subheadings with methodologic textwords and MeSH terms in MEDLINE for identifying sound clinical studies on the etiology, prognosis, diagnosis, prevention and treatment of disorders in general adult medicine.

DESIGN

Analytic survey of the information retrieval properties of methodologic textwords, single methodologic MeSH terms, pre-explosions and subheadings selected to detect studies meeting basic methodologic criteria for direct clinical use in general adult medicine.

MEASURES

The sensitivity, specificity, and precision of search terms were determined by comparing the citations retrieved by the search strategies in MEDLINE with that of a manual review (the gold standard) of all articles in 10 internal and general medicine journals for 1986 and 1991.

RESULTS

For treatment and diagnosis in 1991, and treatment, diagnosis, and etiology in 1986, pre-explosions yielded the highest sensitivity, with typical absolute increases exceeding 15%. For etiology and prognosis in 1991, and prognosis in 1986, textwords or MeSH terms yielded the highest sensitivity. In all cases the increase in sensitivity was coupled with a loss in specificity and precision.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with searching with single methodologic textwords and subject headings, the detection of sound clinical studies on the diagnosis and treatment of disorders in general adult medicine was consistently enhanced by searching with pre-explosions, but at a price of decreased specificity and precision.

摘要

目的

比较医学主题词表(MEDLINE)中副标题与方法学文本词及医学主题词(MeSH)的检索特征,以识别关于普通成人医学中疾病病因、预后、诊断、预防和治疗的可靠临床研究。

设计

对方法学文本词、单一方法学MeSH词、预扩展词和副标题的信息检索特性进行分析调查,以检测符合普通成人医学直接临床应用基本方法学标准的研究。

测量

通过将MEDLINE检索策略检索到的文献引用与对1986年和1991年10种内科和普通医学期刊中所有文章的人工评审(金标准)进行比较,确定检索词的敏感性、特异性和精确性。

结果

对于1991年的治疗和诊断,以及1986年的治疗、诊断和病因,预扩展词产生的敏感性最高,典型的绝对增幅超过15%。对于1991年的病因和预后,以及1986年的预后,文本词或MeSH词产生的敏感性最高。在所有情况下,敏感性的提高都伴随着特异性和精确性的降低。

结论

与使用单一方法学文本词和主题词进行检索相比,使用预扩展词检索可持续提高对普通成人医学中疾病诊断和治疗的可靠临床研究的检测,但代价是特异性和精确性降低。

相似文献

1
Quantitative comparison of pre-explosions and subheadings with methodologic search terms in MEDLINE.对MEDLINE中预爆和副标题与方法学检索词进行定量比较。
Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1994:905-9.
2
Reasons for the loss of sensitivity and specificity of methodologic MeSH terms and textwords in MEDLINE.医学主题词表(MeSH)术语和文本词在MEDLINE中方法学方面的敏感性和特异性丧失的原因。
Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1995:436-40.
3
Assessment of methodologic search filters in MEDLINE.MEDLINE中方法学检索过滤器的评估。
Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1993:601-5.
4
Preliminary assessment of the effect of more informative (structured) abstracts on citation retrieval from MEDLINE.对信息量更大(结构化)摘要对从医学文献数据库(MEDLINE)中检索引用文献的效果的初步评估。
Medinfo. 1995;8 Pt 2:1457-61.
5
Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically sound causation studies in MEDLINE.制定用于在医学文献数据库(MEDLINE)中检测具有临床合理性的因果关系研究的最佳检索策略。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003;2003:719-23.
6
Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically sound prognostic studies in MEDLINE: an analytic survey.制定在医学文献数据库(MEDLINE)中检测具有临床可靠性的预后研究的最佳检索策略:一项分析性调查
BMC Med. 2004 Jun 9;2:23. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-2-23.
7
Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically sound studies in MEDLINE.制定用于在医学文献数据库(MEDLINE)中检索临床合理研究的最佳检索策略。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1994 Nov-Dec;1(6):447-58. doi: 10.1136/jamia.1994.95153434.
8
Optimal search strategies for detecting clinically sound prognostic studies in EMBASE: an analytic survey.在EMBASE中检测临床合理的预后研究的最佳搜索策略:一项分析性调查。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005 Jul-Aug;12(4):481-5. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1752. Epub 2005 Mar 31.
9
Age-specific search strategies for Medline.针对医学在线数据库(Medline)的特定年龄搜索策略。
J Med Internet Res. 2006 Oct 25;8(4):e25. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8.4.e25.
10
Optimal search strategies for retrieving scientifically strong studies of diagnosis from Medline: analytical survey.从医学在线数据库(Medline)检索科学严谨的诊断研究的最佳搜索策略:分析性调查
BMJ. 2004 May 1;328(7447):1040. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38068.557998.EE. Epub 2004 Apr 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Search strategies to identify diagnostic accuracy studies in MEDLINE and EMBASE.在MEDLINE和EMBASE中识别诊断准确性研究的检索策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 11;2013(9):MR000022. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000022.pub3.
2
Development and evaluation of evidence-based nursing (EBN) filters and related databases.循证护理(EBN)筛选工具及相关数据库的开发与评估
J Med Libr Assoc. 2005 Jan;93(1):104-15.
3
[Evidence-based intensive care medicine. Practice, use and significance].[循证重症医学。实践、应用与意义]
Anaesthesist. 2004 Mar;53(3):253-62. doi: 10.1007/s00101-004-0646-8.
4
Bridges between health care research evidence and clinical practice.医疗保健研究证据与临床实践之间的桥梁。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1995 Nov-Dec;2(6):342-50. doi: 10.1136/jamia.1995.96157827.
5
Reasons for the loss of sensitivity and specificity of methodologic MeSH terms and textwords in MEDLINE.医学主题词表(MeSH)术语和文本词在MEDLINE中方法学方面的敏感性和特异性丧失的原因。
Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1995:436-40.

本文引用的文献

1
How to keep up with the medical literature: V. Access by personal computer to the medical literature.如何跟上医学文献的步伐:五、通过个人计算机获取医学文献。
Ann Intern Med. 1986 Nov;105(5):810-6. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-105-5-810.