• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Nefazodone and imipramine in major depression: a placebo-controlled trial.

作者信息

Rickels K, Schweizer E, Clary C, Fox I, Weise C

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

出版信息

Br J Psychiatry. 1994 Jun;164(6):802-5. doi: 10.1192/bjp.164.6.802.

DOI:10.1192/bjp.164.6.802
PMID:7952987
Abstract

Nefazodone is a phenylpiperazine antidepressant with 5-HT2 antagonism and 5-HT reuptake inhibition. Two hundred and eighty-three out-patients with a diagnosis of DSM-III-R major depression of at least one-month duration (65% ill for over 6 months), and a mean score of 24 on the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD), were randomised to treatment with nefazodone, imipramine, or placebo. The double-blind treatment period was 8 weeks in duration. Nefazodone's antidepressant efficacy was comparable with imipramine's, with both drug treatments significantly better than placebo in a variety of outcome measures. For example, after 8 weeks of therapy, 78% of nefazodone and 83% of imipramine but only 55% of placebo patients (P < 0.01) were globally much or very much improved. Nefazodone was better tolerated than imipramine, with fewer drop-outs and a lower incidence of side-effects during treatment.

摘要

相似文献

1
Nefazodone and imipramine in major depression: a placebo-controlled trial.
Br J Psychiatry. 1994 Jun;164(6):802-5. doi: 10.1192/bjp.164.6.802.
2
A double-blind comparison of nefazodone, imipramine, and placebo in major depression.奈法唑酮、丙咪嗪与安慰剂治疗重度抑郁症的双盲对照研究
J Clin Psychiatry. 1994 Jun;55(6):234-41.
3
Responders to antidepressant drug treatment: a study comparing nefazodone, imipramine, and placebo in patients with major depression.抗抑郁药物治疗的应答者:一项比较奈法唑酮、丙咪嗪和安慰剂治疗重度抑郁症患者的研究。
J Clin Psychiatry. 1996;57 Suppl 2:15-8.
4
Nefazodone: aspects of efficacy.奈法唑酮:疗效方面
J Clin Psychiatry. 1995;56 Suppl 6:43-6.
5
Response of anxiety and agitation symptoms during nefazodone treatment of major depression.奈法唑酮治疗重度抑郁症期间焦虑和激越症状的反应
J Clin Psychiatry. 1995;56 Suppl 6:37-42.
6
A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of two dose ranges of nefazodone in the treatment of depressed outpatients.一项关于两种剂量范围的奈法唑酮治疗门诊抑郁症患者的双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
J Clin Psychiatry. 1995;56 Suppl 6:30-6.
7
Controlled comparison of nefazodone and amitriptyline in major depressive inpatients.奈法唑酮与阿米替林治疗重度抑郁住院患者的对照比较。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1994 Jun;115(1-2):254-60. doi: 10.1007/BF02244780.
8
Long-term treatment of depression with nefazodone.使用奈法唑酮进行抑郁症的长期治疗。
Psychopharmacol Bull. 1994;30(2):165-9.
9
Novel serotonergic mechanisms and clinical experience with nefazodone.
Clin Neuropharmacol. 1993;16 Suppl 3:S45-50.
10
Multicentric double-blind study comparing efficacy and safety of minaprine and imipramine in dysthymic disorders.比较米那普明和丙咪嗪治疗心境恶劣障碍疗效及安全性的多中心双盲研究。
Neuropsychobiology. 1995;31(2):68-75. doi: 10.1159/000119175.

引用本文的文献

1
Beneficial and harmful effects of tricyclic antidepressants for adults with major depressive disorder: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.三环类抗抑郁药治疗成人重性抑郁障碍的有益和有害作用:系统评价、荟萃分析和试验序贯分析。
BMJ Ment Health. 2024 Jan 22;27(1):e300730. doi: 10.1136/bmjment-2023-300730.
2
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2018 Jan 15;48(1):64-153.
3
Assessment of health-related quality of life, mental health status and psychological distress based on the type of pharmacotherapy used among patients with depression.
基于抑郁症患者所使用的药物治疗类型对健康相关生活质量、心理健康状况和心理困扰进行评估。
Qual Life Res. 2017 Apr;26(4):969-980. doi: 10.1007/s11136-016-1417-0. Epub 2016 Sep 26.
4
Comparative efficacy and risk of harms of immediate- versus extended-release second-generation antidepressants: a systematic review with network meta-analysis.第二代速释与缓释抗抑郁药的疗效比较及危害风险:一项网状Meta分析的系统评价
CNS Drugs. 2014 Aug;28(8):699-712. doi: 10.1007/s40263-014-0169-z.
5
Less is more in antidepressant clinical trials: a meta-analysis of the effect of visit frequency on treatment response and dropout.在抗抑郁药临床试验中,少即是多:对就诊频率对治疗反应和脱落影响的荟萃分析。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2013 Jul;74(7):703-15. doi: 10.4088/JCP.12r08267.
6
Does differential drop-out explain the influence of study design on antidepressant response? A meta-analysis.差异脱落是否解释了研究设计对抗抑郁反应的影响?一项荟萃分析。
J Affect Disord. 2012 Sep;140(1):57-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2012.01.031. Epub 2012 Mar 2.
7
Randomized, placebo-controlled trials of antidepressants for acute major depression: thirty-year meta-analytic review.抗抑郁药治疗急性重度抑郁症的随机、安慰剂对照试验:三十年的荟萃分析回顾。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2012 Mar;37(4):851-64. doi: 10.1038/npp.2011.306. Epub 2011 Dec 14.
8
Does study design influence outcome?. The effects of placebo control and treatment duration in antidepressant trials.研究设计会影响结果吗?安慰剂对照和治疗持续时间在抗抑郁试验中的作用。
Psychother Psychosom. 2009;78(3):172-81. doi: 10.1159/000209348. Epub 2009 Mar 24.
9
Initial severity and antidepressant benefits: a meta-analysis of data submitted to the Food and Drug Administration.初始严重程度与抗抑郁药疗效:对提交给美国食品药品监督管理局的数据进行的荟萃分析。
PLoS Med. 2008 Feb;5(2):e45. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050045.
10
Antidepressants for depressed elderly.用于老年抑郁症患者的抗抑郁药
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jan 25;2006(1):CD003491. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003491.pub2.