• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抗抑郁药物治疗的应答者:一项比较奈法唑酮、丙咪嗪和安慰剂治疗重度抑郁症患者的研究。

Responders to antidepressant drug treatment: a study comparing nefazodone, imipramine, and placebo in patients with major depression.

作者信息

Cohn C K, Robinson D S, Roberts D L, Schwiderski U E, O'Brien K, Ieni J R

机构信息

Cohn Center, Houston, Tex, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Psychiatry. 1996;57 Suppl 2:15-8.

PMID:8626358
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Nefazodone hydrochloride, an antidepressant that acts as a 5-HT2 antagonist and serotonin (5-HT) and norepinephrine uptake inhibitor, was evaluated in a double-blind, imipramine- and placebo-controlled study involving 128 patients with major depression.

METHOD

Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive placebo (2 to 6 capsules/day), imipramine (100 to 300 mg/day), or nefazodone (200 to 600 mg/day) for 8 weeks. The principal efficacy outcome measure assessed was the number of patients who experienced an adequate response during treatment.

RESULTS

Based on global improvement (Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement), 67% of nefazodone-treated patients (p < or = .01) and 63% of imipramine-treated patients (p < or = .05) responded during 8 weeks of treatment, compared with 36% of placebo controls. Sixty-two percent of nefazodone-treated, 53% of imipramine-treated, and 26% of placebo-treated patients had 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D-17) scores < or = 10 on completion of acute treatment. Nefazodone-treated patients had a lower incidence of premature treatment discontinuation and fewer dropouts for adverse events than the imipramine group.

CONCLUSION

In a three arm comparison with imipramine and placebo, nefazodone had the greatest number of patients with major depression who responded to therapy. Nefazodone, a new antidepressant with novel pharmacology, is a well-tolerated, efficacious antidepressant.

摘要

背景

盐酸奈法唑酮是一种抗抑郁药,具有5-羟色胺2(5-HT2)拮抗剂以及5-羟色胺(5-HT)和去甲肾上腺素摄取抑制剂的作用。在一项涉及128例重度抑郁症患者的双盲、丙咪嗪和安慰剂对照研究中对其进行了评估。

方法

符合条件的患者被随机分配接受安慰剂(每日2至6粒胶囊)、丙咪嗪(每日100至300毫克)或奈法唑酮(每日200至600毫克),疗程为8周。评估的主要疗效指标是在治疗期间出现充分反应的患者数量。

结果

根据整体改善情况(临床总体印象-改善),在8周的治疗期间,67%接受奈法唑酮治疗的患者(p≤0.01)和63%接受丙咪嗪治疗的患者(p≤0.05)有反应,而安慰剂对照组为36%。在急性治疗结束时,62%接受奈法唑酮治疗的患者、53%接受丙咪嗪治疗的患者和26%接受安慰剂治疗的患者17项汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAM-D-17)评分≤10。与丙咪嗪组相比,接受奈法唑酮治疗的患者提前终止治疗的发生率较低,因不良事件退出的患者较少。

结论

在与丙咪嗪和安慰剂的三臂比较中,奈法唑酮治疗有反应的重度抑郁症患者数量最多。奈法唑酮是一种具有新型药理学的新型抗抑郁药,是一种耐受性良好、有效的抗抑郁药。

相似文献

1
Responders to antidepressant drug treatment: a study comparing nefazodone, imipramine, and placebo in patients with major depression.抗抑郁药物治疗的应答者:一项比较奈法唑酮、丙咪嗪和安慰剂治疗重度抑郁症患者的研究。
J Clin Psychiatry. 1996;57 Suppl 2:15-8.
2
Nefazodone: aspects of efficacy.奈法唑酮:疗效方面
J Clin Psychiatry. 1995;56 Suppl 6:43-6.
3
A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of two dose ranges of nefazodone in the treatment of depressed outpatients.一项关于两种剂量范围的奈法唑酮治疗门诊抑郁症患者的双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
J Clin Psychiatry. 1995;56 Suppl 6:30-6.
4
Response of anxiety and agitation symptoms during nefazodone treatment of major depression.奈法唑酮治疗重度抑郁症期间焦虑和激越症状的反应
J Clin Psychiatry. 1995;56 Suppl 6:37-42.
5
The effect of nefazodone on comorbid anxiety symptoms associated with depression: experience in family practice and psychiatric outpatient settings.奈法唑酮对与抑郁症共病的焦虑症状的影响:家庭医疗及精神科门诊环境中的经验
J Clin Psychiatry. 1996;57 Suppl 2:10-4.
6
Nefazodone in the treatment of severe, melancholic, and recurrent depression.奈法唑酮治疗重度、抑郁性及复发性抑郁症
J Clin Psychiatry. 1996;57 Suppl 2:19-23.
7
Efficacy in long-term treatment of depression.抑郁症长期治疗的疗效。
J Clin Psychiatry. 1996;57 Suppl 2:24-30.
8
Comparison of venlafaxine and imipramine in the acute treatment of major depression in outpatients.文拉法辛与丙咪嗪治疗门诊重度抑郁症急性发作的比较
J Clin Psychiatry. 1994 Mar;55(3):104-8.
9
Therapeutic dose range of nefazodone in the treatment of major depression.
J Clin Psychiatry. 1996;57 Suppl 2:6-9.
10
Fast onset: an open study of the treatment of major depressive disorder with nefazodone and pindolol combination therapy.起效迅速:奈法唑酮与吲哚洛尔联合治疗重度抑郁症的开放性研究
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1997 Mar;12(2):91-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Beneficial and harmful effects of tricyclic antidepressants for adults with major depressive disorder: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.三环类抗抑郁药治疗成人重性抑郁障碍的有益和有害作用:系统评价、荟萃分析和试验序贯分析。
BMJ Ment Health. 2024 Jan 22;27(1):e300730. doi: 10.1136/bmjment-2023-300730.
2
Effects of Antidepressants on Sleep in Post-traumatic Stress Disorder: An Overview of Reviews.抗抑郁药对创伤后应激障碍睡眠的影响:综述概述。
Curr Neuropharmacol. 2024;22(4):749-805. doi: 10.2174/1570159X21666230801144328.
3
Problems in the Descriptions of the Psychiatric Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria in Publications of Antidepressant Efficacy Trials: A Qualitative Review and Recommendations for Improved Clarity.
抗抑郁药疗效试验出版物中精神科纳入和排除标准描述的问题:定性综述及提高清晰度的建议
CNS Drugs. 2016 Mar;30(3):185-91. doi: 10.1007/s40263-016-0314-y.
4
Comparative efficacy and risk of harms of immediate- versus extended-release second-generation antidepressants: a systematic review with network meta-analysis.第二代速释与缓释抗抑郁药的疗效比较及危害风险:一项网状Meta分析的系统评价
CNS Drugs. 2014 Aug;28(8):699-712. doi: 10.1007/s40263-014-0169-z.
5
Less is more in antidepressant clinical trials: a meta-analysis of the effect of visit frequency on treatment response and dropout.在抗抑郁药临床试验中,少即是多:对就诊频率对治疗反应和脱落影响的荟萃分析。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2013 Jul;74(7):703-15. doi: 10.4088/JCP.12r08267.
6
Does differential drop-out explain the influence of study design on antidepressant response? A meta-analysis.差异脱落是否解释了研究设计对抗抑郁反应的影响?一项荟萃分析。
J Affect Disord. 2012 Sep;140(1):57-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2012.01.031. Epub 2012 Mar 2.
7
Randomized, placebo-controlled trials of antidepressants for acute major depression: thirty-year meta-analytic review.抗抑郁药治疗急性重度抑郁症的随机、安慰剂对照试验:三十年的荟萃分析回顾。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2012 Mar;37(4):851-64. doi: 10.1038/npp.2011.306. Epub 2011 Dec 14.
8
Antidepressant drug effects and depression severity: a patient-level meta-analysis.抗抑郁药的效果与抑郁严重程度:患者水平的荟萃分析。
JAMA. 2010 Jan 6;303(1):47-53. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1943.
9
Does study design influence outcome?. The effects of placebo control and treatment duration in antidepressant trials.研究设计会影响结果吗?安慰剂对照和治疗持续时间在抗抑郁试验中的作用。
Psychother Psychosom. 2009;78(3):172-81. doi: 10.1159/000209348. Epub 2009 Mar 24.
10
What moderator characteristics are associated with better prognosis for depression?哪些调节者特征与抑郁症的更好预后相关?
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2005 Mar;1(1):51-7. doi: 10.2147/nedt.1.1.51.52298.