Clark M A, Merians A S, Kothari A, Poizner H, Macauley B, Gonzalez Rothi L J, Heilman K M
University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Newark.
Brain. 1994 Oct;117 ( Pt 5):1093-106. doi: 10.1093/brain/117.5.1093.
Geschwind (1975) proposed a disconnection model in which an apraxic subject is unable to carry out movements to command because the left hemisphere that comprehended the verbal command is disconnected from the right premotor and motor areas which controls the left hand. An alternate model, however, proposes that apraxia results from destruction of spatiotemporal representations of learned movement stored in the left hemisphere (Heilman, 1979). The disconnection hypothesis would predict that apraxic subjects should be able to correctly imitate gestures and correctly use actual tools since these tasks do not require language. The movement representation model predicts that imitation and actual tool use would also be impaired. Motion analyses were performed on the trajectories of repetitive 'slicing' gestures made in a series of conditions in which contextual cues were introduced in a graded fashion. Four cue conditions were presented: no cues (verbal command), object present, tool present and both object and tool present. Positions of the hand, wrist, elbow, and shoulder were digitized from neighbouring views, reconstructed in three dimensions and analysed with respect to specific spatiotemporal features of the trajectories. Three subjects with limb apraxia, who had lesions that included left parietal cortex, and four neurologically intact subjects participated. The apraxic subjects showed disturbances in planning the movement of the hand in space across the cue conditions. For example, they showed deficits in the plane of motion, the shape of the trajectory and in the coupling of hand speed and trajectory shape even when given full contextual cues. These data support the hypothesis that apraxia can result from the destruction of spatiotemporal representations of learned movement, rather than from a disconnection between the receptive language areas in the left hemisphere and the contralateral motor cortices.
盖施温德(1975年)提出了一种分离模型,在该模型中,失用症患者无法按指令做出动作,因为理解言语指令的左半球与控制左手的右运动前区和运动区相分离。然而,另一种模型提出,失用症是由于存储在左半球的习得运动的时空表征遭到破坏所致(海尔曼,1979年)。分离假说预测,失用症患者应该能够正确模仿手势并正确使用实际工具,因为这些任务不需要语言。运动表征模型则预测,模仿和实际工具使用也会受损。在一系列逐步引入情境线索的条件下,对重复“切片”手势的轨迹进行了运动分析。呈现了四种线索条件:无线索(言语指令)、有物体、有工具以及物体和工具都有。从相邻视角对手、手腕、肘部和肩部的位置进行数字化处理,在三维空间中重建,并针对轨迹的特定时空特征进行分析。三名患有肢体失用症且病变包括左顶叶皮质的受试者以及四名神经功能正常的受试者参与了研究。失用症受试者在不同线索条件下规划手部在空间中的运动时表现出障碍。例如,即使在给出完整情境线索的情况下,他们在运动平面、轨迹形状以及手速与轨迹形状的耦合方面仍表现出缺陷。这些数据支持了以下假说:失用症可能是由于习得运动的时空表征遭到破坏,而非左半球的接受性语言区域与对侧运动皮层之间的分离所致。