Suppr超能文献

主动触觉与被动触觉:影响体感信号向初级体感皮层传递的因素

Active versus passive touch: factors influencing the transmission of somatosensory signals to primary somatosensory cortex.

作者信息

Chapman C E

机构信息

Centre de recherche en sciences neurologiques, Ecole de réadaptation, Université de Montréal, QC, Canada.

出版信息

Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1994 May;72(5):558-70. doi: 10.1139/y94-080.

Abstract

Active and passive touch, respectively with and without voluntary movement on the part of the subject, are frequently reported to be equivalent in terms of the resultant perceptual abilities. This review reexamines the notion of perceptual equivalence in the light of growing evidence that the transmission of tactile inputs is diminished, or "gated," during the course of active movement. It is concluded that there is indeed gating of cutaneous inputs during active touch. In most experiments, the paradoxical observation of perceptual equivalence between active and passive touch can partly be explained by the choice of task, namely, tactile discriminations that depend on relative, and not absolute, differences in inputs. The surprising lack of evidence for any superiority of passive touch over active touch can likely be explained by several factors. First, performance with active touch may be enhanced by the motor strategy, e.g., by reducing the speed of movement at critical points, and so reducing the degree of gating, and (or) by optimally orienting the exploring digits so as to bring the most sensitive skin areas into contact with the object in question. Second, central influences, including attention and motor set, may be specifically activated during voluntary movement and contribute to enhancing performance during active touch. Thus, the gating influences associated with active touch may be offset, partly or wholly, by the combined influence of these factors to yield (near) perceptual equivalence for active and passive touch.

摘要

主动触摸和被动触摸,分别指受试者有或没有自主运动的情况,人们经常报告称,就所产生的感知能力而言,二者是等效的。鉴于越来越多的证据表明,在主动运动过程中,触觉输入的传递会减少或“被门控”,本综述重新审视了感知等效性的概念。得出的结论是,在主动触摸过程中确实存在皮肤输入的门控现象。在大多数实验中,主动触摸和被动触摸之间感知等效性这一矛盾的观察结果,部分可以通过任务的选择来解释,即取决于输入的相对而非绝对差异的触觉辨别。被动触摸相对于主动触摸没有任何优势这一令人惊讶的证据缺失,可能可以由几个因素来解释。首先,主动触摸的表现可能会通过运动策略得到增强,例如,通过在关键点降低运动速度,从而降低门控程度,和(或)通过优化探索手指的方向,使最敏感的皮肤区域与相关物体接触。其次,包括注意力和运动定势在内的中枢影响,可能在自主运动过程中被特别激活,并有助于提高主动触摸过程中的表现。因此,与主动触摸相关的门控影响可能会被这些因素的综合影响部分或完全抵消,从而使主动触摸和被动触摸产生(近乎)感知等效性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验