Vogler H W, Stienstra J J, Montgomery F, Kipp L
Malmö General Hospital, Sweden.
Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 1994 Jul;11(3):425-47.
The choice of anterior ankle arthroplasty conducted by anterolateral arthrotomy versus arthroscopic techniques depends on the severity of the osteophytosis and the dominance type. This can be determined in most cases by conventional radiology, contrast arthrography, or MRI. Diagnostic arthroscopy may be required when noninvasive means fail to provide the answer to anterior frontier joint pain. Thorough arthroplasty must be performed and the joint placed through its end range of motion to verify reduction of all impingements. Extensive bony impingements are most effectively treated by conventional anterolateral arthrotomy. This is particularly true in posttraumatic cases with considerable arthrofibrosis infiltrate. Lesser degrees of osteophytosis confined, in particular, to the leading tibial edge are effectively reduced by arthroscopic technique. Anterior ankle arthroplasty by either technique offers symptomatic relief of pain with minimal morbidity. It can serve as a definitive treatment protocol for many patients or simply represent a temporary step along the way to more aggressive salvage surgery such as arthrodesis.
经外侧前方关节切开术与关节镜技术进行的前踝关节置换术的选择取决于骨赘形成的严重程度和优势类型。在大多数情况下,这可以通过传统放射学、关节造影或磁共振成像来确定。当非侵入性手段无法解答前方关节疼痛问题时,可能需要进行诊断性关节镜检查。必须进行彻底的关节置换术,并使关节在其运动终末范围内活动,以验证所有撞击均已减轻。广泛的骨撞击最有效地通过传统的外侧前方关节切开术进行治疗。在伴有大量关节纤维化浸润的创伤后病例中尤其如此。特别是局限于胫骨前缘的较轻程度的骨赘形成,通过关节镜技术可有效减轻。两种技术进行的前踝关节置换术均能以最小的发病率缓解疼痛症状。它可以作为许多患者的确定性治疗方案,或者仅仅是通往更积极的挽救手术(如关节融合术)道路上的一个临时步骤。