• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于皮肤病学的彩色医学图像的JPEG和FIF压缩比较。

A comparison of JPEG and FIF compression of color medical images for dermatology.

作者信息

Sneiderman C, Schosser R, Pearson T G

机构信息

National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD 20894.

出版信息

Comput Med Imaging Graph. 1994 Sep-Oct;18(5):339-42. doi: 10.1016/0895-6111(94)90004-3.

DOI:10.1016/0895-6111(94)90004-3
PMID:7954310
Abstract

Dermatologists were shown digitized images of skin lesions compressed by Joint Photographic Expert Group (JPEG) and fractal image format (FIF) algorithms and asked to make a diagnostic assessment and rate the image quality in displaying the features necessary for that assessment. Dermatologists performance in the diagnostic assessment was not affected by the level of compression (up to 40X) using either algorithm, but ratings of image quality for all compressed images were significantly lower than for uncompressed images and for the original photographic slides. There were no significant differences in dermatologists' performance or ratings between the two compression algorithms.

摘要

研究人员向皮肤科医生展示了通过联合图像专家组(JPEG)和分形图像格式(FIF)算法压缩的皮肤病变数字化图像,并要求他们进行诊断评估,并对图像在显示该评估所需特征方面的质量进行评分。使用这两种算法中的任何一种,皮肤科医生在诊断评估中的表现都不受压缩水平(高达40倍)的影响,但所有压缩图像的图像质量评分均显著低于未压缩图像和原始照片幻灯片。两种压缩算法在皮肤科医生的表现或评分上没有显著差异。

相似文献

1
A comparison of JPEG and FIF compression of color medical images for dermatology.用于皮肤病学的彩色医学图像的JPEG和FIF压缩比较。
Comput Med Imaging Graph. 1994 Sep-Oct;18(5):339-42. doi: 10.1016/0895-6111(94)90004-3.
2
JPEG vs. JPEG2000: benchmarking with dermatological images.JPEG 与 JPEG2000:皮肤病图像基准测试。
Skin Res Technol. 2014 Feb;20(1):67-73. doi: 10.1111/srt.12085. Epub 2013 May 31.
3
Evaluation of JPEG and JPEG2000 compression algorithms for dermatological images.评估用于皮肤科图像的 JPEG 和 JPEG2000 压缩算法。
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2010 Aug;24(8):893-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2009.03538.x. Epub 2009 Dec 10.
4
Digital image compression in dermatology: format comparison.皮肤病学中的数字图像压缩:格式比较
Telemed J E Health. 2008 Sep;14(7):666-70. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2007.0119.
5
Is JPEG compression of videomicroscopic images compatible with telediagnosis? Comparison between diagnostic performance and pattern recognition on uncompressed TIFF images and JPEG compressed ones.视频显微镜图像的JPEG压缩是否适用于远程诊断?未压缩的TIFF图像与JPEG压缩图像的诊断性能和模式识别比较。
Telemed J E Health. 2004 Fall;10(3):294-303. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2004.10.294.
6
Wavelet versus JPEG (Joint Photographic Expert Group) and fractal compression. Impact on the detection of low-contrast details in computed radiographs.小波变换与JPEG(联合图像专家组)及分形压缩。对计算机X线摄影中低对比度细节检测的影响。
Invest Radiol. 1998 Aug;33(8):456-63. doi: 10.1097/00004424-199808000-00006.
7
Joint photographic experts group (JPEG) compatible data compression of mammograms.乳腺X线照片的联合图像专家组(JPEG)兼容数据压缩。
J Digit Imaging. 1994 Aug;7(3):123-32. doi: 10.1007/BF03168505.
8
Grading, image analysis, and stereopsis of digitally compressed fundus images.数字压缩眼底图像的分级、图像分析和立体视
Retina. 2000;20(3):275-81.
9
Assessment of visually lossless irreversible image compression: comparison of three methods by using an image-comparison workstation.视觉无损不可逆图像压缩评估:使用图像比较工作站对三种方法进行比较
Radiology. 2000 May;215(2):543-53. doi: 10.1148/radiology.215.2.r00ap47543.
10
A comparison of two compression algorithms and the detection of caries.两种压缩算法的比较与龋齿检测
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2002 Jul;31(4):257-63. doi: 10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600704.