Wu H, Zhu W, Xu J
PUMC Hospital, CAMS and PUMC, Beijing.
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao. 1994 Feb;16(1):48-53.
Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was calculated by echocardiography and gate blood pool (GBP) in 33 patients including those with coronary heart disease, acute and old myocardiac infarction, cardiomyopathy or mitral prolapse. Fourteen of the 33 had segmental wall motion abnormalities and 19 had non-segmental wall motion abnormalities. The results of comparing echocardiography and GBP showed that the former could substitute for other invasive and expensive examinations to determine LVEF (r = 0.804-0.964 in the 5 echocardiography methods used). Mod-Simpsons method of cross-sectioned echocardiography was the most accurate echocardiographic method (r = 0.964, sensitivity 90.9%) in all patients. The Teich method of M-mode echocardiography was useful in patients who had non-segmental wall motion abnormalities only (r = 0.957, sensitivity 94.7%) but not in patients who had segmental wall motion abnormalities (r = 0.703, sensitivity 42.9%).
通过超声心动图和门控心血池(GBP)对33例患者进行左心室射血分数(LVEF)计算,这些患者包括冠心病、急性和陈旧性心肌梗死、心肌病或二尖瓣脱垂患者。33例患者中,14例有节段性室壁运动异常,19例有非节段性室壁运动异常。超声心动图与GBP比较结果显示,前者可替代其他有创且昂贵的检查来测定LVEF(在所使用的5种超声心动图方法中,r = 0.804 - 0.964)。在所有患者中,横断面超声心动图的改良辛普森法是最准确的超声心动图方法(r = 0.964,敏感性90.9%)。M型超声心动图的泰希法仅对仅有非节段性室壁运动异常的患者有用(r = 0.957,敏感性94.7%),而对有节段性室壁运动异常的患者无用(r = 0.703,敏感性42.9%)。