Champsaur G, Parisot P, Martinot S, Ninet J, Robin J, Ovize M, Brulé P, Neidecker J, Franck M
Hôpital Cardiologique, Lyon, France.
Circulation. 1994 Nov;90(5 Pt 2):II47-50.
The main advantage of pulsatile flow compared with steady flow during cardiopulmonary bypass is to prevent a rise in systemic vascular resistances. We hypothesized that pulsatile flow could overcome the progressive rise in peripheral and placental vascular resistances observed during fetal bypass and leading to progressive irreversible hypoxemia.
A study was undertaken in 17 fetal lambs (110 to 140 days of gestation). Fetal bypass was established for a 30-minute period through right atrial and main pulmonary artery cannulation. The circuit had no oxygenator. Flow was delivered by a standard roller pump for the continuous study (group 1, n = 9) or by a centrifugal pulsatile pump for the pulsatile study (group 2, n = 8). Oxymetric and hemodynamic parameters, along with organ blood flow determined by radiolabeled microspheres counting, were recorded before (T1) and after 10 minutes (T2) and 30 minutes (T3) of bypass. SaO2 and PaO2 were significantly higher in group 2 than in group 1 at T2 but thereafter deteriorated similarly in both groups, whereas PCO2 remained unchanged. Pump flow in group 2 was significantly higher than in group 1 at T2 and T3 (957.6 +/- 49 and 1104 +/- 152 versus 437.6 +/- 23 and 467.8 +/- 43 mL/min, respectively). Systemic vascular resistances during pulsatile bypass were also significantly lower than in group 1 at T2 (402 +/- 12 versus 930 +/- 79 dynes/sec/cm-5) and T3 (374 +/- 60 versus 1017 +/- 192 dynes/sec/cm-5). At T2 and T3, all individual blood flows except the brain but including the placenta were statistically higher in group 2 than in group 1. Placental vascular resistances gradually increased during bypass in group 1 to reach 2.9 +/- 0.2 mm Hg.mL-1.min-1.kg-1 at T3 and remained approximately stable in group 2 during 30 minutes of pulsatile bypass, varying from 0.35 +/- 0.02 to 1.26 +/- 0.14 from T2 to T3 (P < .01).
The data suggest that pulsatile flow for 30 minutes of bypass in a fetal lamb preparation temporarily prevents the progressive hypoxemia observed under steady-flow bypass. Pulsatile flow allows higher pump flow through a significant decrease in systemic vascular resistances. Individual organ blood flow, including placenta, was significantly higher under pulsatile bypass. With technical improvements in the design of pulsatile devices adapted to more physiological beat rates, pulsatility may become a valuable adjunct to overcome placental dysfunction observed during experimental fetal cardiac surgery.
与体外循环期间的稳流相比,搏动血流的主要优势在于防止全身血管阻力升高。我们推测搏动血流能够克服胎儿体外循环期间观察到的外周和胎盘血管阻力的逐渐升高,并导致进行性不可逆性低氧血症。
对17只胎羊(妊娠110至140天)进行了一项研究。通过右心房和主肺动脉插管建立30分钟的胎儿体外循环。该回路没有氧合器。连续研究组(第1组,n = 9)通过标准滚压泵输送血流,搏动研究组(第2组,n = 8)通过离心搏动泵输送血流。在体外循环前(T1)、10分钟后(T2)和30分钟后(T3)记录血氧测定和血流动力学参数,以及通过放射性微球计数确定的器官血流。在T2时,第2组的SaO2和PaO2显著高于第1组,但此后两组情况相似地恶化,而PCO2保持不变。在T2和T3时,第2组的泵流量显著高于第1组(分别为957.6±49和1104±152,对比437.6±23和467.8±43 mL/分钟)。搏动性体外循环期间的全身血管阻力在T2时也显著低于第1组(402±12对比930±79达因/秒/cm⁻⁵)和T3时(374±60对比1017±192达因/秒/cm⁻⁵)。在T2和T3时,除大脑外但包括胎盘在内的所有单个器官血流在第2组中在统计学上高于第1组。在第1组中,体外循环期间胎盘血管阻力逐渐增加,在T3时达到2.9±0.2 mmHg·mL⁻¹·min⁻¹·kg⁻¹,而在第2组搏动性体外循环30分钟期间保持大致稳定,从T2到T3从0.35±0.02变化到1.26±0.14(P <.01)。
数据表明,在胎羊准备中进行30分钟体外循环的搏动血流可暂时防止在稳流体外循环下观察到的进行性低氧血症。搏动血流通过显著降低全身血管阻力允许更高的泵流量。在搏动性体外循环下,包括胎盘在内的单个器官血流显著更高。随着搏动装置设计的技术改进以适应更生理的搏动频率,搏动性可能成为克服实验性胎儿心脏手术期间观察到的胎盘功能障碍的有价值辅助手段。