Ward S C, Carey B M, Chalmers A G, Sutton J
Department of Radiology, Cookridge Hospital, Leeds.
Clin Radiol. 1994 Aug;49(8):531-4. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9260(05)82930-7.
A prospective study of 130 fine-needle aspiration biopsies (FNAB) was performed on 110 consecutive patients to assess the contribution of immediate cytological evaluation (ICE). All biopsies were performed under CT guidance using either 20 gauge or 22 gauge aspiration needles. Two distinct patient groups were derived from two hospitals. In one hospital a consultant cytologist was usually present, whereas in the other immediate cytological evaluation was not generally available. Overall, a consultant cytologist was present for 52% of the biopsies. The accuracy of the procedure, the number of needle passes made, the complication rates with and without ICE were assessed for each hospital population group. The overall accuracy, with and without ICE, was 72%. Although slightly fewer specimens were deemed inadequate when ICE was available, this difference did not reach statistical significance.
对110例连续患者的130次细针穿刺活检(FNAB)进行了一项前瞻性研究,以评估即时细胞学评估(ICE)的作用。所有活检均在CT引导下使用20号或22号穿刺针进行。两个不同的患者组来自两家医院。在一家医院,通常有一位会诊细胞病理学家在场,而在另一家医院,一般无法进行即时细胞学评估。总体而言,52%的活检有会诊细胞病理学家在场。对每个医院人群组评估了该操作的准确性、穿刺针数、有无ICE时的并发症发生率。有ICE和无ICE时的总体准确率均为72%。尽管在有ICE时被认为不合格的标本略少,但这种差异未达到统计学意义。