• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超声检查医师在非产科超声检查中作用的审计

An audit of the role of the sonographer in non-obstetric ultrasound.

作者信息

Bates J A, Conlon R M, Irving H C

机构信息

Ultrasound Department, St James's University Hospital, Leeds.

出版信息

Clin Radiol. 1994 Sep;49(9):617-20. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9260(05)81878-1.

DOI:10.1016/s0009-9260(05)81878-1
PMID:7955888
Abstract

In order to investigate the role of the sonographer in non-obstetric ultrasound, 1046 consecutive non-obstetric ultrasound scans performed by sonographers were audited. In 94% of cases, the report prepared by the sonographer gave an accurate account of the findings. In 6.3% of reports the radiologist provided additional comments, whilst in only 0.7% of cases was the sonographer's report significantly altered. In the 630 patients in whom adequate follow-up data was available, there was a single instance of a false positive ultrasound finding but no other significant ultrasound inaccuracy. This audit indicates that the local arrangements for involving sonographers in a non-obstetric ultrasound service has resulted in agreed standards being met. It is suggested that sonographers can and should be involved more widely in the provision of non-obstetric ultrasound services.

摘要

为了调查超声检查医师在非产科超声检查中的作用,对超声检查医师连续进行的1046例非产科超声扫描进行了审核。在94%的病例中,超声检查医师编写的报告对检查结果进行了准确描述。在6.3%的报告中,放射科医生提供了额外的意见,而只有0.7%的病例中超声检查医师的报告有显著改动。在有足够随访数据的630例患者中,有1例假阳性超声检查结果,但没有其他明显的超声检查不准确情况。此次审核表明,当地让超声检查医师参与非产科超声服务的安排已达到商定标准。建议超声检查医师能够且应该更广泛地参与非产科超声服务的提供。

相似文献

1
An audit of the role of the sonographer in non-obstetric ultrasound.超声检查医师在非产科超声检查中作用的审计
Clin Radiol. 1994 Sep;49(9):617-20. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9260(05)81878-1.
2
Image and report quality in non-obstetric ultrasound examinations undertaken by sonographers: Results of an audit of 3731 cases.超声检查医师进行的非产科超声检查中的图像和报告质量:3731例病例的审核结果
Ultrasound. 2022 Feb;30(1):28-35. doi: 10.1177/1742271X211033006. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
3
An audit of a radiographer based ultrasound service.一项基于放射技师的超声服务审计。
Br J Radiol. 1994 Jul;67(799):665-7. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-67-799-665.
4
Caveat reporting in ultrasound interpretation of surgical pathology: a comparison of sonographer versus radiologist.超声解读外科病理学报告中的警示:超声医师与放射科医师的比较。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2010 Feb;16(1):97-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01120.x. Epub 2010 Jan 14.
5
Ultrasound Practice Redesign to Improve Image Quality: Implementation of a Quality Control Sonographer.超声实践重新设计以提高图像质量:实施质量控制超声检查技师制度
J Am Coll Radiol. 2020 Dec;17(12):1644-1652. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2020.07.015. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
6
Value of selective second-look sonography by radiologists.放射科医生进行选择性二次超声检查的价值。
Radiology. 1996 May;199(2):551-3. doi: 10.1148/radiology.199.2.8668810.
7
An Audit of Second-Trimester Fetal Anomaly Scans Based on a Novel Image-Scoring Method in the Southwest Region of the Netherlands.基于一种新型图像评分方法对荷兰西南部地区孕中期胎儿畸形扫描的审计。
J Ultrasound Med. 2017 Jun;36(6):1171-1179. doi: 10.7863/ultra.16.06055. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
8
Radiologist and Sonographer Interpretation Discrepancies for Biliary Sonographic Findings: Our Experience.放射科医生与超声科医生对胆道超声检查结果解读的差异:我们的经验
Ultrasound Q. 2017 Dec;33(4):261-264. doi: 10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000280.
9
Interobserver variability of the measurement of fetal nasal bone length between 11+0 and 13+6 gestation weeks among experienced and inexperienced sonographers.经验丰富和经验不足的超声检查医师在孕11⁺⁰至13⁺⁶周期间测量胎儿鼻骨长度的观察者间差异。
Ultraschall Med. 2009 Feb;30(1):42-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1027402. Epub 2008 Sep 4.
10
Ultrasound clinical teaching capacity in England: A scoping exercise.英国的超声临床教学能力:一项范围界定研究。
Radiography (Lond). 2020 Feb;26(1):3-8. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2019.09.005. Epub 2019 Oct 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Diversity of current ultrasound practice within and outside radiology departments with a vision for 20 years into the future: a position paper of the ESR ultrasound subcommittee.放射科内外当前超声实践的多样性以及对未来20年的展望:欧洲放射学会超声小组委员会立场文件
Insights Imaging. 2023 Nov 24;14(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s13244-023-01548-w.
2
Embedding new technology into clinical ultrasound practice: Is role extension for sonographers the key to improving patient pathways?将新技术融入临床超声实践:超声医师的角色扩展是改善患者就医流程的关键吗?
Ultrasound. 2023 May;31(2):84-90. doi: 10.1177/1742271X221139210. Epub 2022 Dec 27.
3
Audit: sonographic report correlation against surgical findings during elective shoulder surgery.
审计:择期肩部手术期间超声报告与手术结果的相关性
Ultrasound. 2022 May;30(2):141-148. doi: 10.1177/1742271X211033314. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
4
Image and report quality in non-obstetric ultrasound examinations undertaken by sonographers: Results of an audit of 3731 cases.超声检查医师进行的非产科超声检查中的图像和报告质量:3731例病例的审核结果
Ultrasound. 2022 Feb;30(1):28-35. doi: 10.1177/1742271X211033006. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
5
Do radiologists need to review abdominal ultrasound examinations reported as 'normal' by the sonographer?放射科医生需要对超声检查技师报告为“正常”的腹部超声检查进行复查吗?
Australas J Ultrasound Med. 2020 Feb 28;23(3):167-175. doi: 10.1002/ajum.12202. eCollection 2020 Aug.
6
Letter to the Editor in response to the Position statement and best practice recommendations on the imaging use of ultrasound from the European Society of Radiology ultrasound subcommittee.致编辑的信:回应欧洲放射学会超声小组委员会关于超声成像使用的立场声明和最佳实践建议
Insights Imaging. 2021 May 20;12(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s13244-021-01002-9.