Olliaro P, Regazzetti A, Marchetti A L, Lanzarini P, Spinillo A, Gorini G
Institute for Infectious Diseases, IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Eur J Epidemiol. 1994 Feb;10(1):47-50. doi: 10.1007/BF01717451.
In this matched-pair study 139 pregnant women were matched on the basis of age to an equal number of non-pregnant women with no signs of genital infection. The mean age was 28.7 years (range 20-41). The cut-offs used for detection of chlamydial antibody were 1:64 and 1:128 for IgG and 1:16 for IgA. IgG antibody at 64 was detected in 37.4% of pregnant women, compared to 46% of controls (p = 0.145). There was, however, a statistically significant difference between the groups for IgG at 128 (gravidae = 15.8%; controls = 28%; p = 0.014). IgA were detected in 8.6% and 16.5% of subjects, respectively (p = 0.047). IgG levels did not vary with increasing age among the pregnant women, but rose significantly with age in non-pregnant controls (logistic regression p-values = 0.011 and 0.006, for IgG at 64 and 128, respectively). IgG-positive women in the control group tended to be older than pregnant IgG-positive women (p = 0.06). These differences could not be explained by marital status, parity or use of oral contraceptives. In view of the lack of epidemiological differences, biological explanations might be invoked.
在这项配对研究中,139名孕妇根据年龄与同等数量无生殖器感染迹象的非孕妇进行配对。平均年龄为28.7岁(范围20 - 41岁)。用于检测衣原体抗体的临界值,IgG为1:64和1:128,IgA为1:16。孕妇中IgG抗体为64时的检出率为37.4%,而对照组为46%(p = 0.145)。然而,两组中IgG抗体为128时存在统计学显著差异(孕妇 = 15.8%;对照组 = 28%;p = 0.014)。IgA在受试者中的检出率分别为8.6%和16.5%(p = 0.047)。孕妇中IgG水平不随年龄增长而变化,但在非孕妇对照组中随年龄显著升高(逻辑回归p值,IgG为64时 = 0.011,IgG为128时 = 0.006)。对照组中IgG阳性女性往往比孕妇IgG阳性女性年龄大(p = 0.06)。这些差异无法用婚姻状况、产次或口服避孕药的使用来解释。鉴于缺乏流行病学差异,可能需要从生物学角度进行解释。