Inoue T, Sawa Y, Matsuda H, Shimazaki Y, Kaneko M, Kadoba K, Kuratani T, Kawashima Y
First Department of Surgery, Osaka University Medical School, Japan.
Heart Vessels. 1994;9(4):188-93. doi: 10.1007/BF01746063.
Using an isolated perfusion model of neonatal rabbit hearts aged 3 to 6 days, cardioplegic arrest (CPA) using crystalloid cold cardioplegia with aortic cross clamp (AXC: 60 min, n = 15) and continuous deep hypothermic perfusion (DHP) at 15 degrees C without AXC (n = 15) were compared. The hearts were divided into two subgroups: intact hearts (n = 18) and with preceding 40 min warm ischemia (stressed hearts, n = 22). In the intact hearts, there were no significant differences between the CPA and DHP groups in left ventricular function, myocardial water content, and myocardial mitochondrial score after reperfusion. In the stressed hearts, recovery of cardiac output and left ventricular work was significantly higher in the DHP group than in the CPA group. The post-reperfusion myocardial mitochondrial score was significantly better in the DHP group than in the CPA group. These results suggest that non-AXC DHP may be advantageous in the setting of stressed hearts with preceding ischemic injury where conventional CPA cannot provide adequate myocardial protection.
采用3至6日龄新生兔心脏的离体灌注模型,比较使用晶体冷停搏液并夹闭主动脉(主动脉交叉夹闭:60分钟,n = 15)进行心脏停搏(CPA)和在15℃下不进行主动脉交叉夹闭的持续深度低温灌注(DHP,n = 15)。心脏被分为两个亚组:完整心脏(n = 18)和预先经历40分钟温暖缺血的心脏(应激心脏,n = 22)。在完整心脏中,再灌注后CPA组和DHP组在左心室功能、心肌含水量和心肌线粒体评分方面无显著差异。在应激心脏中,DHP组的心输出量和左心室作功的恢复显著高于CPA组。再灌注后DHP组的心肌线粒体评分显著优于CPA组。这些结果表明,在先前存在缺血性损伤的应激心脏中,非主动脉交叉夹闭的DHP可能具有优势,而传统的CPA无法提供足够的心肌保护。