Greco C, Boccanelli A, Piazza V, Prati F, Lioy E, Zanchi E, Cecchetti C, Boschetti C, Pagamici G, Prati P L
Divisione Cardiologia A. S. Camillo Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Int J Card Imaging. 1994 Jun;10(2):131-6. doi: 10.1007/BF01137708.
The resumption of contractility of asynergic segments in survivors after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) may be detected in viable myocardial areas. We have correlated the detection of viable myocardium, assessed with low dose dobutamine testing, with coronary angiography and clinical outcome in 66 consecutive survivors of AMI using the echocardiographic evidence of left ventricular wall motion abnormalities. The test enabled the identification of two groups: group A, comprising 32 patients (pts) demonstrating wall motion recovery at dobutamine infusion and group B, comprising 34 pts without wall motion recovery. The mean basal asynergy score index was 5.8 +/- 4.2 in group A and 6.0 +/- 4.2 in group B (p = ns). With dobutamine testing the score decreased to 2.8 +/- 3.6 in group A (p < 0.001 with respect to basal value), while it did not change significantly in group B. Left ventricular end diastolic volume (ml) was similar in the two groups (114 +/- 35 vs 107 +/- 79, p = NS). The infarct related artery (IRA) patency rate was 87.5% in group A, vs 26.5% in group B (p < 0.001). After a mean follow-up of 11 +/- 5 months, group A pts had basal asynergy score improvement (2.6 +/- 3.1, p < 0.001) and mild left ventricular end diastolic volume (ml) reduction, (108 +/- 32, p = NS), while group B pts had left ventricle end diastolic volume enlargement (130 +/- 38, p < 0.05), without score asynergy modification. Moreover all pts who experienced heart failure at follow-up were in group B.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
急性心肌梗死(AMI)幸存者中无协同收缩节段收缩性的恢复情况,可在存活心肌区域检测到。我们通过低剂量多巴酚丁胺试验评估存活心肌,并将其与冠状动脉造影以及66例连续的AMI幸存者的临床结局进行关联分析,这些患者均有左心室壁运动异常的超声心动图证据。该试验确定了两组:A组,包括32例患者,在多巴酚丁胺输注时显示壁运动恢复;B组,包括34例无壁运动恢复的患者。A组基础无协同收缩评分指数平均为5.8±4.2,B组为6.0±4.2(p=无显著差异)。多巴酚丁胺试验时,A组评分降至2.8±3.6(相对于基础值p<0.001),而B组无显著变化。两组左心室舒张末期容积(ml)相似(114±35对107±79,p=无显著差异)。A组梗死相关动脉(IRA)通畅率为87.5%,B组为26.5%(p<0.001)。平均随访11±5个月后,A组患者基础无协同收缩评分改善(2.6±3.1,p<0.001),左心室舒张末期容积(ml)轻度降低(108±32,p=无显著差异),而B组患者左心室舒张末期容积增大(130±38,p<0.05),无协同收缩评分改变。此外,随访期间发生心力衰竭的所有患者均在B组。(摘要截短于250字)