Gold M, Shuren J, Heilman K M
Department of Neurology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville 32610-0236.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1994 Nov;57(11):1395-400. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.57.11.1395.
Although neglect has been demonstrated in the horizontal, vertical, and radial planes of space and has been attributed to sensory-attentional, motor-intentional, and representational deficits, motor intentional neglect in the radial plane has not been previously described. A patient who had a right parietal infarct was tested with a modified cancellation task that uses a fixed window, thereby controlling attentional demands and allowing one to dissociate between intentional and representational neglect. This patient showed proximal (radial) intentional neglect (a failure to move towards or in proximal space). Unlike controls whose search times decreased with increasing window size, our patient showed no change in search time as a function of window size. This pattern of behaviour suggests that the patient's search strategy does not incorporate factors such as the relation between a fixed target space and a variably sized aperture, but rather was based on the allocation of a certain amount of resources for a fixed period of time after which, regardless of performance, the patient would stop searching.
尽管忽视现象已在空间的水平、垂直和径向平面得到证实,并被归因于感觉-注意力、运动意图和表征缺陷,但径向平面的运动意图忽视此前尚未见报道。对一名患有右侧顶叶梗死的患者进行了一项改良的划消任务测试,该任务使用固定窗口,从而控制注意力需求,并能够区分意图忽视和表征忽视。该患者表现出近端(径向)意图忽视(无法向近端空间移动或在近端空间内移动)。与搜索时间随窗口大小增加而减少的对照组不同,我们的患者搜索时间并未随窗口大小而变化。这种行为模式表明,患者的搜索策略并未纳入诸如固定目标空间与可变大小孔径之间的关系等因素,而是基于在固定时间段内分配一定量的资源,在此之后,无论表现如何,患者都会停止搜索。