The protein quality of some enteral products is inferior to that of casein as assessed by rat growth methods and digestibility-corrected amino acid scores.

Protein digestibility and quality of six enteral nutrition products sold in Canada were studied by rat balance and growth methods. Casein+L-methionine, 0.2 g/100 g diet (control) and six enteral products (freeze-dried) were fed as the sole source of protein in diets containing 8.61-9.12 g/100 g protein (N x 6.25) to weanling and 18-mo-old rats for a period of 2 and 1 wk, respectively. A protein-free diet was also included in the feeding studies to permit calculations of true protein digestibility and net protein ratio values. Values for true digestibility of protein as determined in old rats for the control diet and the test products were 95 and 89-93%, respectively. Compared with old rats, protein digestibility values were 5-7 percentage units higher in young rats. The 2-wk relative protein efficiency ratio values (42-56%) or the relative net protein ratio values (61-74%) of the enteral products were considerably lower compared to those of the control (100). Supplementation of an enteral product with cysteine, cysteine + tryptophan, cysteine + threonine or cysteine + tryptophan + threonine caused significant improvement in protein quality; suggesting that the product was limiting in these three amino acids. The protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores for the enteral products were 43-46, 69-75 and 86-93% by using whole egg, casein and the FAO-WHO (1991) pattern as reference proteins, respectively. The results indicate that these enteral products are inferior to casein in protein quality.