Suppr超能文献

因果取向、失败与成就。

Causality orientations, failure, and achievement.

作者信息

Koestner R, Zuckerman M

机构信息

Department of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

J Pers. 1994 Sep;62(3):321-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1994.tb00300.x.

Abstract

Two studies examined similarities between Deci and Ryan's (1985) causality orientations theory and Dweck and Leggett's (1988) social-cognitive theory of achievement. Study 1 examined the conceptual similarity between the individual difference measures central to the two theories. It was shown that autonomous college students are likely to adopt learning goals and report high confidence in their academic abilities; controlled students are likely to adopt performance goals and to report high levels of confidence in their ability; and impersonal students are likely to possess the classic helpless pattern of performance goals and low confidence in their academic abilities. Study 2 examined whether causality orientations, like Dweck's measures of goals and confidence, moderate the impact of failure feedback on motivation as measured in persistence and performance. The results suggested that autonomous individuals respond to failure in a mastery-oriented fashion, whereas impersonal individuals respond in a helpless manner. The response of controlled individuals to failure parallels that of people described as ego-involved or reactive.

摘要

两项研究考察了德西和瑞安(1985)的因果取向理论与德韦克和莱格特(1988)的成就社会认知理论之间的相似性。研究1考察了这两种理论核心的个体差异测量方法之间的概念相似性。结果表明,自主型大学生可能会采用学习目标,并对自己的学业能力表现出高度自信;受控型学生可能会采用成绩目标,并对自己的能力表现出高度自信;而冷漠型学生可能具有典型的成绩目标无助模式,且对自己的学业能力缺乏信心。研究2考察了因果取向是否像德韦克的目标和信心测量方法一样,调节失败反馈对动机的影响(以坚持性和表现来衡量)。结果表明,自主型个体以掌握为导向应对失败,而冷漠型个体则以无助的方式应对。受控型个体对失败的反应与被描述为自我卷入或反应性的人的反应相似。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验