Suppr超能文献

[一种肿瘤学领域止吐药的临床研发。一项荟萃分析]

[The clinical development of an antiemetic in oncology. A meta-analysis].

作者信息

Pérez Campos A

机构信息

División Médica, Laboratorios Almirall, S.A. Barcelona.

出版信息

Med Clin (Barc). 1994 Sep 17;103(8):281-6.

PMID:7967877
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To perform meta-analysis (MT) on antiemetic efficacy of LAS 30451 (Pancopride) in high and moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (CT).

METHODS

The results of 13 phase II and III clinical trials comparing the efficacy of different doses of the drug under study with or without corticoids, or versus standard treatment (methochlopramide and/or corticosteroids and diphenhydramine) were included. The principal variable was complete protection in the acute phase (0 vomiting following 24 h post treatment).

RESULTS

The design was open in 3, simple blind in 4 and double blind in 6, with 11 being parallel and 2 crossed. The trials were carried out in 39 centers of 5 countries with 999 patients who received 1,292 cycles of antiemetic treatment. On comparison of lower or equal doses at 0.2 mg/kg of pancopride vs higher doses global OR was 0.94 (p = 0.72) with a global percentage difference (GPD) of -4.69% (p = 0.23) and GPD equal to -6.90. On treatment without cysplatin global OFR was equal to 1.10 (p = 0.69) with GPD of -8.99% favoring dosage lower than or equal to 0.2 mg/kg. The dexamethasone increased antiemetic efficacy of pancopride in both treatments with cysplatin (50% vs 76%, p = 0.08) and without cysplatin (50% to 89%, p = 0.02). When pancopride was compared with that of standard antiemetic treatment (methochlopramide and/or corticosteroids) global OR was equal to 0.69 (p = 0.07) with GPD of -6.84% favoring the control treatment. In CT containing cysplatin, global OR was equal to 0.73 (p = 0.38) with GPD of -3.28% and with CT without cysplatin the global OR was 0.66. (p = 0.12) with a GPD of -4.92% in both cases favoring the control treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

No statistically significant differences were observed with regard to the antiemetic efficacy of pancopride on comparison of different doses of the drug. The antiemetic efficacy of pancopride increases when given together with dexamethasone. The efficacy of pancopride is lower to that of methochlopramide in combination with corticosteroids and/or diphenhydramine although the differences are not statistically significant.

摘要

背景

对LAS 30451(潘托必利)在高度和中度致吐性化疗(CT)中的止吐疗效进行荟萃分析(MT)。

方法

纳入13项II期和III期临床试验的结果,这些试验比较了不同剂量的研究药物与或不与皮质类固醇联合使用,或与标准治疗(甲氧氯普胺和/或皮质类固醇及苯海拉明)的疗效。主要变量是急性期的完全保护(治疗后24小时无呕吐)。

结果

设计为开放试验3项,简单盲法试验4项,双盲试验6项,其中11项为平行试验,2项为交叉试验。试验在5个国家的39个中心进行,999例患者接受了1292个周期的止吐治疗。比较潘托必利0.2mg/kg及以下剂量与较高剂量时,总体比值比(OR)为0.94(p = 0.72),总体百分比差异(GPD)为 -4.69%(p = 0.23),GPD等于 -6.90。在无顺铂治疗时,总体OR等于1.10(p = 0.69),GPD为 -8.99%,支持剂量低于或等于0.2mg/kg。地塞米松在顺铂治疗(50%对76%,p = 0.08)和无顺铂治疗(50%至89%,p = 0.02)中均增加了潘托必利的止吐疗效。当将潘托必利与标准止吐治疗(甲氧氯普胺和/或皮质类固醇)比较时,总体OR等于0.69(p = 0.07),GPD为 -6.84%,支持对照治疗。在含顺铂的CT中,总体OR等于0.73(p = 0.38),GPD为 -3.28%;在无顺铂的CT中,总体OR为0.66(p = 0.12),两种情况下GPD均为 -4.92%,支持对照治疗。

结论

在比较药物不同剂量时,未观察到潘托必利止吐疗效的统计学显著差异。潘托必利与地塞米松联合使用时止吐疗效增加。潘托必利的疗效低于甲氧氯普胺联合皮质类固醇和/或苯海拉明的疗效,尽管差异无统计学意义。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验