Suppr超能文献

添加β-2激动剂并不能改善高血压患者β-1阻滞剂的运动反应。

Adding beta-2 agonism does not improve beta-1 blockade exercise responses in hypertensives.

作者信息

Rueckert P A, Slane P R, Hanson P

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin Medical School, Madison 53792-3248.

出版信息

Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1994 Aug;26(8):945-50.

PMID:7968427
Abstract

We tested the hypothesis that celiprolol, a beta-1 adrenoceptor antagonist with the ancillary property of beta-2-mediated vasodilation, would increase blood flow to active muscles during exercise and result in less impairment of exercise performance compared with the beta-1 antagonist atenolol. After an initial 3-wk washout phase, 11 untrained hypertensive men participated in a 6-wk crossover study of the two drugs. Each treatment phase was followed by a 3-wk placebo phase. Resting forearm and calf vascular resistance measured by venous occlusion plethysmography and submaximal and maximal bicycle ergometry exercise responses were evaluated at the end of each treatment and placebo phase. Celiprolol significantly decreased resting forearm and calf vascular resistance whereas atenolol had no significant effect. Neither beta-blocker significantly affected submaximal exercise oxygen uptake, rate of perceived exertion, minute ventilation, or respiratory exchange ratio. Both beta-blockers significantly and similarly decreased peak oxygen uptake; celiprolol 23.9 +/- 1.7, atenolol 24.9 +/- 1.7, placebo 27.3 +/- 1.3 ml.kg-1.min-1. Our findings suggest that during exercise while on beta-blockade, other factors such as sympathetic vasoconstriction or local metabolic vasodilation may override beta-2-mediated vasodilation. Thus, the addition of beta-2 agonism to beta-1 antagonism decreases resting vascular resistance but offers no advantage over conventional beta-1 blockade therapy during exercise.

摘要

我们检验了以下假设

塞利洛尔,一种具有β2介导血管舒张辅助特性的β1肾上腺素能受体拮抗剂,与β1拮抗剂阿替洛尔相比,在运动期间会增加流向活跃肌肉的血流量,并导致运动表现的损害更小。在最初为期3周的洗脱期后,11名未经训练的高血压男性参与了这两种药物的为期6周的交叉研究。每个治疗阶段之后是为期3周的安慰剂阶段。在每个治疗和安慰剂阶段结束时,通过静脉阻塞体积描记法测量静息前臂和小腿血管阻力,并评估次最大和最大自行车测力计运动反应。塞利洛尔显著降低了静息前臂和小腿血管阻力,而阿替洛尔没有显著影响。两种β受体阻滞剂对次最大运动摄氧量、主观用力程度、分钟通气量或呼吸交换率均无显著影响。两种β受体阻滞剂均显著且相似地降低了峰值摄氧量;塞利洛尔为23.9±1.7,阿替洛尔为24.9±1.7,安慰剂为27.3±1.3 ml·kg-1·min-1。我们的研究结果表明,在运动期间使用β受体阻滞剂时,其他因素如交感神经血管收缩或局部代谢性血管舒张可能会超过β2介导的血管舒张作用。因此,在β1拮抗作用基础上增加β2激动作用可降低静息血管阻力,但在运动期间与传统的β1阻滞剂治疗相比并无优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验