Chow S L
Department of Psychology, University of Regina, SK, Canada.
Mem Cognit. 1994 Sep;22(5):525-32. doi: 10.3758/bf03198391.
Using a signal-detection task, the generality of Turvey's (1973) onset-onset rule was tested in our experiments. After seeing, in succession, (1) one or two letters (target display), (2) a multiletter detection display, and (3) a mask display, subjects decided whether or not the letter or letters in the target display reappeared in the succeeding detection display at different levels of detection-display duration in various situations. The subjects' sensitivity was inconsistent with the onset-onset rule. More specifically, sensitivity increased with increases in display duration within a fixed stimulus onset asynchrony of 150 msec. Display duration, however, had no effect on response bias. Nor was there any interaction between display duration and display size in terms of either sensitivity or response bias. The more complicated relationship between display duration and display size does not invalidate the departure from the onset-onset rule.
在我们的实验中，使用信号检测任务对图维（1973）的起始-起始规则的普遍性进行了测试。在相继看到（1）一个或两个字母（目标显示）、（2）一个多字母检测显示和（3）一个掩蔽显示之后，受试者要判断在不同情况下，在不同检测显示持续时间下，目标显示中的一个或多个字母是否在随后的检测显示中再次出现。受试者的敏感性与起始-起始规则不一致。更具体地说，在150毫秒的固定刺激起始异步条件下，敏感性随着显示持续时间的增加而增加。然而，显示持续时间对反应偏差没有影响。在敏感性或反应偏差方面，显示持续时间和显示大小之间也没有任何交互作用。显示持续时间和显示大小之间更复杂的关系并不能使偏离起始-起始规则的情况无效。
