Suppr超能文献

替扎尼定治疗多发性硬化所致痉挛:一项双盲、安慰剂对照试验的结果。美国替扎尼定研究组

Tizanidine treatment of spasticity caused by multiple sclerosis: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. US Tizanidine Study Group.

作者信息

Smith C, Birnbaum G, Carter J L, Greenstein J, Lublin F D

机构信息

St. Agnes Hospital, White Plains, New York.

出版信息

Neurology. 1994 Nov;44(11 Suppl 9):S34-42; discussion S42-3.

PMID:7970009
Abstract

This multicenter, stratified, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial evaluated tizanidine for use in the United States for spasticity secondary to MS. The 15-week trial was divided into baseline (weeks 0 and 1), titration (2 mg to a maximum of 36 mg/d; weeks 2 to 4), and plateau (weeks 5 to 13) phases, followed by dose tapering (week 14) and a final visit (week 15). Primary efficacy parameters were scores on muscle tone (Ashworth Scale) and type and frequency of muscle spasms (patient diaries). All efficacy parameters were evaluated by the physician/assessor, and the physician/prescriber was responsible for all dosage adjustments. The patient, physician/assessor, and physician/prescriber made global evaluations of antispastic efficacy. Tizanidine produced a significantly greater reduction than placebo in spasms and clonus (patient diaries) but no significant differences in Ashworth scores. Patients and physician/prescribers, but not physician/assessors, gave significantly better scores in the overall assessment of efficacy and tolerability. No significant differences in other secondary efficacy parameters were noted. Adverse events were reported for 66 (61%) of the 109 placebo-treated patients and 101 (91%) of the 111 tizanidine-treated patients; 6 (6%) and 14 (13%) discontinued treatment, respectively. Patient and physician perception of improvement demonstrated more consistent differences between groups than did the Ashworth Scale, perhaps because of inexperience with this measure or failure to consider time between drug administration and assessment.

摘要

这项多中心、分层、随机、安慰剂对照、双盲试验评估了替扎尼定在美国用于治疗继发于多发性硬化症的痉挛的疗效。为期15周的试验分为基线期(第0周和第1周)、滴定期(2毫克至最大36毫克/天;第2周和第4周)、平台期(第5周和第13周),随后是剂量递减期(第14周)和末次访视(第15周)。主要疗效参数为肌张力评分(Ashworth量表)以及肌肉痉挛的类型和频率(患者日记)。所有疗效参数均由医生/评估者进行评估,医生/开处方者负责所有剂量调整。患者、医生/评估者和医生/开处方者对抗痉挛疗效进行整体评估。与安慰剂相比,替扎尼定在痉挛和阵挛(患者日记)方面的减轻幅度显著更大,但在Ashworth评分方面无显著差异。患者和医生/开处方者在疗效和耐受性的整体评估中给出的评分明显更好,但医生/评估者并非如此。在其他次要疗效参数方面未发现显著差异。109名接受安慰剂治疗的患者中有66名(61%)报告了不良事件,111名接受替扎尼定治疗的患者中有101名(91%)报告了不良事件;分别有6名(6%)和14名(13%)患者停止治疗。与Ashworth量表相比,患者和医生对改善情况的感知在两组之间表现出更一致的差异,这可能是因为对该测量方法缺乏经验或未考虑给药与评估之间的时间间隔。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验