Scaglia M, Ribero F, Comotti F, Campra D, Delaini G G, Hultén L
I Divisone di Chirurgia Generale, Ospedale Maria Vittoria, Torino.
Minerva Chir. 1994 May;49(5):383-92.
Functional changes after posterior abdominal rectopexy for the treatment of rectal prolapse are not fully understood. We studied the effects of Wells' or Ripstein's rectopexy on functional characteristics as related to anal sphincter function, rectal volume and sensory function in 31 patients with complete or internal rectal prolapse. We have observed an improvement of continence over 70% in both groups. However, an absent or a decreased call to stool, constipation and evacuation difficulties are the aftermath of Wells' rectopexy, while these complaints appear basically unaffected by Ripstein's technique. Maximal squeeze pressure was slightly increased after Ripstein's rectopexy, whereas no significant effects were found on anal pressures. Postoperatively the rectal capacity was reduced by Well's procedure (p < 0.05), while no significant changes were observed with Ripstein's operation. After the Wells procedure patients developed at the threshold for the relaxation of the internal sphincter progressively lower rectal volumes, reaching one year after rectopexy the statistical significance. Sensory thresholds for sense of filling and urge were significantly raised after Wells' rectopexy even one year after operation, whereas after Ripstein's operation sense of filling was not significantly affected and while sense of urge was increased early postoperatively, it was not significantly changed at one hear postoperative control. In conclusion, when fecal incontinence appears associated to a rectal prolapse has good chances to improve postoperatively. Preoperative evacuation difficulties seem to be unaffected by a posterior abdominal rectopexy, Wells or Ripstein, but an extensive dissection of the rectum with the division of the lateral stalks, as it is performed in Wells' operation, seems to be a procedure that can create a further burden of problems the the patient and it seems coupled to a manovolumetric elevation of rectal sensory thresholds.
经腹直肠固定术治疗直肠脱垂后的功能变化尚未完全明确。我们研究了Wells术式或Ripstein术式对31例完全性或内脱垂型直肠脱垂患者肛门括约肌功能、直肠容量及感觉功能等功能特性的影响。我们观察到两组患者的控便能力均有超过70%的改善。然而,Wells直肠固定术后会出现便意缺失或减少、便秘及排便困难,而这些症状在Ripstein术式中基本未受影响。Ripstein直肠固定术后最大收缩压略有升高,而对肛门压力无显著影响。Wells术式术后直肠容量减小(p<0.05),而Ripstein手术未观察到显著变化。Wells手术后患者内括约肌松弛阈值时的直肠容量逐渐降低,直肠固定术后一年达到统计学意义。即使在术后一年,Wells直肠固定术后充盈感和便意的感觉阈值仍显著升高,而Ripstein手术后充盈感未受显著影响,虽然术后早期便意增加,但在术后一年复查时无显著变化。总之,当大便失禁与直肠脱垂相关时,术后有较好的改善机会。术前排便困难似乎不受经腹直肠固定术(Wells或Ripstein术式)影响,但如Wells手术那样广泛游离直肠并切断侧蒂,似乎会给患者带来更多问题,且似乎与直肠感觉阈值的压力容积测定升高有关。