• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响永久性单腔透析导管的导管及技术存活的因素和并发症。

Factors and complications affecting catheter and technique survival with permanent single-lumen dialysis catheters.

作者信息

De Meester J, Vanholder R, De Roose J, Ringoir S

机构信息

Department of Nephrology, University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.

出版信息

Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1994;9(6):678-83. doi: 10.1093/ndt/9.6.678.

DOI:10.1093/ndt/9.6.678
PMID:7970096
Abstract

This long-term study on the outcome of permanent silicone single-lumen dialysis catheters consisted of 43 surgically inserted catheters in 33 patients. All catheters were attached to a pressure-pressure single-cannula dialysis system. Technique and catheter survival were 80 and 59% at 1 year, and 63 and 50% at the 3rd year respectively. These parameters were not different in older patients (> or = 70 years, n = 12). Factors corresponding to a less successful outcome were placement in the left jugular vein (3-month actuarial survival of 44%) and absence of distal side holes (1-year actuarial survival of 44%). Insertion in both subclavian veins was not different to the classical right jugular vein. Infectious complications (incidence of 0.72 per 1000 catheter days) often caused simultaneous catheter and technique failure (14 versus 15%), whereas inadequate flow (incidence of 2 per 1000 catheter days) caused catheter rather than technique failure (30 versus 12%). The incidence of both complications declined significantly with time after insertion during the follow-up period. The first 3 months after insertion were more predisposed to the occurrence of inadequate flow than catheter-related infections. The general performance of these permanent single-lumen catheter devices justifies their long-term application in haemodialysis, even as a first choice of vascular access, especially in the elderly. Insertion in the left jugular vein and use of catheters without side holes should be avoided, providing a better catheter survival.

摘要

这项关于永久性硅胶单腔透析导管使用结果的长期研究纳入了33例患者的43根通过手术置入的导管。所有导管均连接至压力-压力单套管透析系统。1年时的技术生存率和导管生存率分别为80%和59%,3年时分别为63%和50%。在老年患者(≥70岁,n = 12)中,这些参数并无差异。与预后较差相关的因素包括置管于左颈内静脉(3个月精算生存率为44%)和无远端侧孔(1年精算生存率为44%)。双侧锁骨下静脉置管与经典的右颈内静脉置管并无差异。感染并发症(每1000导管日发生率为0.72)常导致导管和技术同时失败(分别为14%和15%),而血流量不足(每1000导管日发生率为2)导致导管而非技术失败(分别为30%和12%)。在随访期间,随着置管后时间的推移,这两种并发症的发生率均显著下降。置管后的前3个月比导管相关感染更易发生血流量不足。这些永久性单腔导管装置的总体性能证明了其在血液透析中的长期应用是合理的,即使作为血管通路的首选,尤其是在老年患者中。应避免在左颈内静脉置管以及使用无侧孔的导管,以提高导管生存率。

相似文献

1
Factors and complications affecting catheter and technique survival with permanent single-lumen dialysis catheters.影响永久性单腔透析导管的导管及技术存活的因素和并发症。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1994;9(6):678-83. doi: 10.1093/ndt/9.6.678.
2
REcanalisation and Balloon-Oriented Puncture for Re-Insertion of Dialysis Catheter in Nonpatent Central Veins (REBORN).非通畅中心静脉内透析导管重新置入的再通和球囊导向穿刺(REBORN)
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2016 Aug;39(8):1193-8. doi: 10.1007/s00270-016-1383-5. Epub 2016 Jun 1.
3
[Permanent vascular catheters for extracorporeal dialysis. Preliminary study: Canaud and Tesio catheters].
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 1998 Mar;50(1):51-4.
4
[Access for starting kidney replacement therapy: vascular and peritoneal temporal access in pre-dialysis].[开始肾脏替代治疗的通路:透析前的血管和腹膜临时通路]
Nefrologia. 2008;28 Suppl 3:105-12.
5
Two single-lumen noncuffed catheters in the jugular vein as long-term vascular access: a preliminary report.两条颈内静脉单腔无套囊导管作为长期血管通路:初步报告
Ther Apher Dial. 2011 Jun;15(3):311-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-9987.2011.00957.x.
6
[Tunneled dialysis catheters placement program in Clinical Hospital Merkur].[梅尔库临床医院的隧道式透析导管置入项目]
Acta Med Croatica. 2011 Oct;65 Suppl 3:54-7.
7
Hemodialysis catheters with citrate locking in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury treated with intermittent online hemofiltration or hemodialysis.在接受间歇性在线血液滤过或血液透析治疗的急性肾损伤危重症患者中使用柠檬酸盐封管的血液透析导管。
Ther Apher Dial. 2009 Aug;13(4):327-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-9987.2009.00734.x.
8
Temporary hemodialysis catheters as a long-term vascular access in chronic hemodialysis patients.临时血液透析导管作为慢性血液透析患者的长期血管通路。
Ther Apher Dial. 2005 Jun;9(3):250-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1774-9987.2005.00265.x.
9
Mediastinal approach to the placement of tunneled hemodialysis catheters in patients with central vein occlusion in an outpatient access center.在门诊血管通路中心,针对中心静脉闭塞患者采用纵隔入路放置带隧道的血液透析导管。
J Vasc Access. 2011 Jul-Sep;12(3):258-61. doi: 10.5301/JVA.2010.6084.
10
Subclavian vein dialysis access catheter-complications are low.锁骨下静脉透析通路导管并发症发生率较低。
Nepal Med Coll J. 2010 Dec;12(4):248-52.

引用本文的文献

1
Placement of long-term hemodialysis catheter (permcath) in patients with end-stage renal disease through external jugular vein.通过颈外静脉为终末期肾病患者置入长期血液透析导管(Permcath)。
Adv Biomed Res. 2014 Dec 6;3:252. doi: 10.4103/2277-9175.146381. eCollection 2014.