DiGiovanni J, Rho O, Xian W, Beltràn L
University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Science Park-Research Division, Smithville 78957.
Prog Clin Biol Res. 1994;387:113-38.
The mouse skin model of multistage carcinogenesis continues to serve as a major in vivo model for studying the sequential and stepwise evolution of the cancer process by chemical and physical carcinogens. The initiation stage of mouse skin carcinogenesis involves genetic damage in the form of DNA adducts or initiator-induced DNA base changes. These changes ultimately lead to mutations in critical target genes of epidermal stem cells. The rasHa gene, and to a limited extent the N-ras gene, have been identified as target genes for certain tumor initiators in this model system (reviewed in DiGiovanni 1992). The promotion stage of mouse skin carcinogenesis involves the production and maintenance of a chronic state of hyperplasia and cell proliferation and ultimately the selective clonal expansion of initiated cells. The hallmark of all tumor promoters that have been adequately tested is their ability to induce a potentiated hyperplasia after several treatments that is greater than that observed after a single application. Tumor promoters produce many effects when applied topically to mouse skin. Many of the effects that occur after a single application of phorbol esters such as TPA appear to be mediated by its interaction with PKC (Nishizuka 1989). An important question is whether the activation of PKC per se is responsible for tumor promotion by TPA. Because repetitive treatments with TPA lead to a sustained loss of PKC, it is possible that other effects not mediated by PKC but produced by phorbol esters and related compounds may play an important role in the production and maintenance of chronic hyperplasia and cell proliferation in the skin and for skin tumor promotion. More attention should be placed on studying the promoting actions of other compounds outside of the most commonly studied phorbol esters. Investigations of some of these compounds already have and will continue to provide important clues regarding possible common pathways shared by diverse promoting agents. One such pathway may involve the EGFr and its ligand TGF alpha. As discussed in this review, it is now evident that many different types of promoting agents increase production of TGF alpha (Ellem et al. 1988, Pittelkow et al. 1989, Choi et al. 1991, Imamoto et al. 1991, J. DiGiovanni unpublished studies). Although many tumor promoters initially decrease the binding of 125I-EGF to EGFr in specific cell types, including mouse epidermal cells, the long-term effects of tumor promoters, especially after repetitive treatments, may be considerably different.+4
多阶段致癌作用的小鼠皮肤模型仍然是研究化学和物理致癌物导致癌症过程的顺序性和逐步演变的主要体内模型。小鼠皮肤致癌作用的起始阶段涉及以DNA加合物或引发剂诱导的DNA碱基变化形式存在的遗传损伤。这些变化最终导致表皮干细胞关键靶基因的突变。在该模型系统中,rasHa基因以及在一定程度上的N-ras基因已被确定为某些肿瘤引发剂的靶基因(DiGiovanni 1992年综述)。小鼠皮肤致癌作用的促进阶段涉及慢性增生和细胞增殖状态的产生和维持,最终导致起始细胞的选择性克隆扩增。所有经过充分测试的肿瘤促进剂的标志是它们在多次处理后能够诱导比单次应用后观察到的更强的增生。肿瘤促进剂局部应用于小鼠皮肤时会产生多种效应。单次应用佛波酯(如TPA)后出现的许多效应似乎是由其与蛋白激酶C(PKC)的相互作用介导的(Nishizuka 1989)。一个重要的问题是PKC的激活本身是否是TPA促进肿瘤的原因。由于用TPA重复处理会导致PKC持续丧失,因此有可能不是由PKC介导而是由佛波酯和相关化合物产生的其他效应在皮肤慢性增生和细胞增殖的产生和维持以及皮肤肿瘤促进中起重要作用。应该更加关注研究最常研究的佛波酯以外的其他化合物的促进作用。对其中一些化合物的研究已经并将继续提供有关不同促进剂可能共有的途径的重要线索。这样一种途径可能涉及表皮生长因子受体(EGFr)及其配体转化生长因子α(TGFα)。如本综述中所讨论的,现在很明显,许多不同类型的促进剂会增加TGFα的产生(Ellem等人,1988年;Pittelkow等人,1989年;Choi等人,1991年;Imamoto等人,1991年;J. DiGiovanni未发表的研究)。尽管许多肿瘤促进剂最初会降低125I-表皮生长因子(EGF)与EGFr在特定细胞类型(包括小鼠表皮细胞)中的结合,但肿瘤促进剂的长期效应,尤其是在重复处理后,可能会有很大不同。