Little A F, Baron R L, Peterson M S, Confer S R, Dodd G D, Chambers T P, Federle M P, Oliver J H, Orons P D, Sammon J K
Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, PA 15213-2582.
Radiology. 1994 Dec;193(3):651-5. doi: 10.1148/radiology.193.3.7972803.
To evaluate whether computed tomographic arterial portography (CTAP) is best performed with injections in the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) or the splenic artery.
Seventy-one studies were performed with injection into the SMA (n = 37) or splenic artery (n = 34) of 150 mL of contrast material at 1.5 mL/sec and 20-second delay for both groups. Images were reviewed for location and type of nontumoral perfusion abnormalities. The degree of liver parenchymal enhancement with each technique was compared.
Fewer nontumoral perfusion defects were seen with splenic artery (65%) versus SMA (78%) injection. Visual differences in contrast enhancement with greater attenuation in dependent portions of the liver were seen with greater frequency with SMA (41%) than with splenic artery (24%) injection. Contrast enhancement that obscured detail in the right lobe was seen only with SMA injections (16%). Greater parenchymal enhancement (up to 18 HU) at all time intervals was seen with splenic artery injection.
Because of greater parenchymal enhancement and fewer nontumoral perfusion abnormalities, splenic artery catheterization is the preferred technique for CTAP.
评估在肠系膜上动脉(SMA)或脾动脉注射造影剂进行计算机断层扫描动脉门静脉造影(CTAP)是否效果最佳。
两组均以1.5 mL/秒的速度注射150 mL造影剂,并延迟20秒,分别在15例患者的肠系膜上动脉(n = 37)或脾动脉(n = 34)进行了71次研究。对图像进行检查,观察非肿瘤灌注异常的部位和类型。比较了两种技术下肝脏实质强化的程度。
与注射到肠系膜上动脉相比,注射到脾动脉时观察到的非肿瘤灌注缺陷较少(65% 对78%)。与脾动脉注射(24%)相比,肠系膜上动脉注射(41%)时更频繁地出现肝脏依赖部位对比度增强且衰减更大的视觉差异。仅在肠系膜上动脉注射时出现了掩盖右叶细节的对比度增强(16%)。脾动脉注射在所有时间间隔内均显示出更大的实质强化(高达18 HU)。
由于实质强化更大且非肿瘤灌注异常较少,脾动脉插管是CTAP的首选技术。