Suppr超能文献

[血清组织多肽抗原测定在支气管肺癌中的重要性。癌胚抗原、糖类抗原19.9和神经元特异性烯醇化酶的比较研究]

[Importance of serum TPA determination in bronchopulmonary cancer. A comparative study of CEA, CA 19.9 and NSE].

作者信息

Prévost A, Passemard F, Perdu D, Vallerand H, Deschamps F, Lavaud F, Larbre H

机构信息

Département des Maladies Respiratoires, Hôpital Maison-Blanche, CHU Reims, Reims.

出版信息

Rev Mal Respir. 1994;11(4):379-84.

PMID:7973038
Abstract

This study concerns 45 patients group one suffering from broncho-pulmonary cancer, the diagnosis was obtained by bronchial biopsies or by transparietal puncture using a scanner: there were 35 non-small cell bronchial carcinomas (CNPC) and 10 small cell bronchial cancers (CPC). The control patients (99 patients) were divided up as follows: 44 pleuro-pulmonary infections (group two) and 55 with respiratory failure of various causes other than infectious episodes (group three). In group one the level for TPA was positive in 30 cases (the threshold value was 90 units per litre), 9 for CA 19.9, 7 for ACE and 9 for NSE. The overall sensitivity was thus better for TPA. There was no correlation between TPA and type of tumour histology nor between the different markers. Their association did not improve the sensitivity. The NSE however, remained the most sensitive test for the diagnosis of CPC with six positive tests out of ten. In the control population, the specificity of TPA (66%) was less than that of ACE (100%) or of CA 19.9 (94%) and the false positives were significantly more numerous in group two: 21 patients had a positive test compared to only 12 in group three. Finally we noticed an increase in the level of TPA contrary to other markers, as a function of the extent of the disease from the carcinoma (CNPC unique). The TPA is thus the most sensitive and it turns out to be better reflector to the extent of the tumour disease than either ACE, CA 19.9 or NSE but this applies uniquely to non-small cell carcinoma.

摘要

本研究涉及45例一组患有支气管肺癌的患者,诊断通过支气管活检或使用扫描仪经胸壁穿刺获得:其中有35例非小细胞支气管癌(CNPC)和10例小细胞支气管癌(CPC)。对照患者(99例)分为如下几组:44例胸膜肺部感染(二组)和55例因非感染性发作导致各种原因呼吸衰竭的患者(三组)。在一组中,30例患者TPA水平呈阳性(阈值为每升90单位),9例CA 19.9呈阳性,7例ACE呈阳性,9例NSE呈阳性。因此,TPA的总体敏感性更好。TPA与肿瘤组织学类型之间以及不同标志物之间均无相关性。它们的联合使用并未提高敏感性。然而,NSE仍然是诊断CPC最敏感的检测方法,10例中有6例检测呈阳性。在对照人群中,TPA的特异性(66%)低于ACE(100%)或CA 19.9(94%),二组中的假阳性明显更多:21例患者检测呈阳性,而三组中只有12例。最后,我们注意到与其他标志物相反,TPA水平随着非小细胞癌(仅CNPC)疾病范围的增加而升高。因此,TPA是最敏感的,并且事实证明它比ACE、CA 19.9或NSE更能反映肿瘤疾病的范围,但这仅适用于非小细胞癌。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验