Goldstein B D
Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute, Piscataway, New Jersey 08855.
Toxicol Pathol. 1994 Mar-Apr;22(2):194-7. doi: 10.1177/019262339402200213.
The Committee on Risk Assessment Methodology of the Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology of the National Academy of Sciences has considered issues related to the use of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in carcinogenesis bioassays and of 2-stage models of carcinogenesis. In each case, the goal has been to consider whether sufficient information is available to lead to a change in current methodology used by regulatory agencies in assessing risk. The majority of the committee favored retention of the MTD but recommended that lower doses also be used for cancer bioassays and, if the results are positive, performance of additional mechanistic studies aimed at improved extrapolation to environmentally relevant concentrations. The minority recommended that additional preliminary studies be done in order to obtain information about the highest dose relevant to extrapolation to humans for use in the cancer bioassay. Two-stage carcinogenesis models were found to be an excellent approach to increase understanding but required an extensive toxicological data base beyond that available for most chemicals. These deliberations have highlighted the value of increased understanding of the basic mechanisms of action of potential cancer-causing chemicals in order to advance the methodology of risk assessment.
美国国家科学院环境研究与毒理学委员会风险评估方法委员会已审议了与致癌生物测定中最大耐受剂量(MTD)的使用以及致癌作用两阶段模型相关的问题。在每种情况下,目标都是考虑是否有足够信息导致监管机构在评估风险时所用现行方法的改变。委员会的大多数成员赞成保留MTD,但建议在癌症生物测定中也使用较低剂量,并且如果结果呈阳性,则开展更多旨在改进向环境相关浓度外推的机制研究。少数成员建议开展更多初步研究,以便获取与外推至人类用于癌症生物测定相关的最高剂量的信息。两阶段致癌模型被认为是增进理解的极佳方法,但需要一个比大多数化学品现有数据更广泛的毒理学数据库。这些审议突出了增进对潜在致癌化学物质基本作用机制的理解对于推进风险评估方法的价值。